-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
incubator-kie-issues#1483: Create a common Kie Flyway initializer for Kie Modules #2014
Conversation
In this PR I tried addressing the examples that use flyway to consume the new initializer, however a lot of the examples are still using the old images. So I'll leave them as they are for now. |
PR job Reproducerbuild-chain build full_downstream -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${AUTHOR:apache}/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/${BRANCH:main}/.ci/buildchain-config-pr-cdb.yaml' -o 'bc' -p apache/incubator-kie-kogito-examples -u #2014 --skipParallelCheckout NOTE: To install the build-chain tool, please refer to https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain#local-execution Please look here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/pullrequest_jobs/job/kogito-examples-pr/job/PR-2014/4/display/redirect Test results:
Those are the test failures: org.kie.kogito.examples.quarkus.GrafanaDockerComposeIT.testGrafanaDashboards1 expectation failed.JSON path title doesn't match. Expected: a collection containing "dmn-drools-quarkus-metrics_999-SNAPSHOT - hello - Operational Dashboard" Actual: <[dmn-drools-quarkus-metrics_999-SNAPSHOT - Custom - Domain Dashboard, dmn-drools-quarkus-metrics_999-SNAPSHOT - Custom - Operational Dashboard, dmn-drools-quarkus-metrics_999-SNAPSHOT - Hello - Domain Dashboard, dmn-drools-quarkus-metrics_999-SNAPSHOT - LoanEligibility - Domain Dashboard, dmn-drools-quarkus-metrics_999-SNAPSHOT - LoanEligibility - Operational Dashboard]> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM @pefernan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM @pefernan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
not a bad idea to align everything with the new kie flyway. @pefernan could you open an issue for future tracking? |
sure @porcelli, actually I think it would be good doing it. |
@porcelli there we go apache/incubator-kie-issues#1501 |
… Kie Modules (apache#2014) * incubator-kie-issues#1483: Create a common Kie Flyway initializer for Kie Modules * - swf test fixes * - fix import order * - adding kie-flyway config * - restoring platform flyway setup for Data Index & Jobs Service containers
Closes apache/incubator-kie-issues#1483
Ensemble:
apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes#3672
apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps#2102
#2014
Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!
Please make sure that your PR meets the following requirements:
WARNING! Please make sure you are opening your PR against
main
branch!KOGITO-XYZ Subject
[0.9.x] KOGITO-XYZ Subject
How to replicate CI configuration locally?
Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.
build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.
How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
for pull request checks
Please add comment: Jenkins retest this
for a specific pull request check
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-examples] tests
for quarkus branch checks
Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch
for a quarkus branch specific check
Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-examples] quarkus-branch
for quarkus main checks
Run checks against Quarkus main branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main
for a specific quarkus main check
Run checks against Quarkus main branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-examples] quarkus-main
for quarkus lts checks
Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts
for a specific quarkus lts check
Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-examples] quarkus-lts
for native checks
Run native checks
Please add comment: Jenkins run native
for a specific native check
Run native checks
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-examples] native
for native lts checks
Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run native-lts
for a specific native lts check
Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-examples] native-lts
How to backport a pull request to a different branch?
In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format
backport-<branch-name>
, where<branch-name>
is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g.,backport-7.67.x
to backport the original PR to the7.67.x
branch).Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.
If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.