Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

YARN-11726: Add logging statements for successful and unsuccessful password retrieval operation #7148

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Hean-Chhinling
Copy link

@Hean-Chhinling Hean-Chhinling commented Nov 5, 2024

Description of PR

This pull request enhances the getPassword method in the WebAppUtils class within Hadoop YARN by adding logging for password retrieval operations. Previously, if the password retrieval failed due to a misconfiguration or other issues, it failed silently, providing no indication of the error. This update adds:

  • INFO Logging: Logs successful password retrieval attempts, showing which alias was retrieved.
  • ERROR Logging: Logs failures in retrieving passwords along with the alias and error details.
  • WARN Logging: Logs when the password is null at the end.

These changes improve transparency and traceability, making it easier for administrators to identify misconfigurations or other issues in YARN's password management.

How was this patch tested?

The changes were tested using the unit tests for the getPassword method, and I added new getPasswordIOException for checking the error log when exception happens. These methods performed successfully showing the added logging functionality. No additional integration tests were required since this change only affects logging behavior.

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 18m 28s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 50m 43s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 49s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 43s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 38s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 48s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 56s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 49s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 43s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 40m 59s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 39s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 39s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 34s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 javac 0m 34s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 28s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 43s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 43s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 42s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 40m 22s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 5m 28s hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 38s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
169m 18s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7148/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7148
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 0023e191541f 5.15.0-119-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 2 19:25:20 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 809e3d8
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7148/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 527 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7148/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 18m 11s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 1s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 1s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 test4tests 0m 0s The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 51m 29s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 49s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 42s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 38s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 47s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 57s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 48s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 43s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 41m 7s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 39s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 39s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 34s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 javac 0m 34s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 0m 27s /results-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-common.txt hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common: The patch generated 1 new + 13 unchanged - 0 fixed = 14 total (was 13)
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 38s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 43s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 41s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 44s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 42m 3s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 6m 15s hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 39s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
172m 9s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7148/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7148
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux dd7fd1f47a8a 5.15.0-119-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 2 19:25:20 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / d0ba380
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7148/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 528 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7148/2/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

@K0K0V0K K0K0V0K left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Hean-Chhinling for the PR!
I hade some minor comments, but the PR looks mostly fine for me.

}
}
catch (IOException ioe) {
password = null;
LOG.error("Unable to retrieve password for alias: {}", alias, ioe);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If i see well here the void error(String var1, Object var2, Object var3); called, so the 3th throwable wont be logged in this case. Also in this case two error log will be created, so maybe debug level will be also fine here.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @K0K0V0K,
Thank you for your feedbacks. By default SLF4J logging will handle the Throwable as the last parameter for exception logging. Therefore, I do not need another place {} holder for it.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried with a DEBUG level log and log message does not appear when I run the unit test that simulate the Exception. I think it better with an ERROR level because now I changed when the password is null it log with WARN level. So when the exception happens, it will log with two log messages in two levels ERROR and WARN.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, seems you are right

@@ -509,11 +512,18 @@ static String getPassword(Configuration conf, String alias) {
char[] passchars = conf.getPassword(alias);
if (passchars != null) {
password = new String(passchars);
LOG.info("Successful password retrieval for alias: {}", alias);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think debug level will be enough here, to avoid too much log record.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not so sure, because when I try with DEBUG level and run the unit test the log message is not shown. I think it is override by other log level that is why I used INFO level to see it every time.

Is there a way to see a DEBUG level logs in some cases when the user wants?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants