Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor](metrics) Remove IntAtomicCounter & CoreLocal #45742 #45870

Merged

Conversation

zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick from #45742

1. Remove `IntAtomicCounter`, it is equal to `IntCounter`.
2. Remove `CoreLocal` related code. It is not used any more.
@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@zhiqiang-hhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.38% (9535/26206)
Line Coverage: 27.91% (78571/281546)
Region Coverage: 26.58% (40334/151748)
Branch Coverage: 23.34% (20428/87536)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/157839e792befac9e9e2ed6952739c0c3132b637_157839e792befac9e9e2ed6952739c0c3132b637/report/index.html

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 64195d7 into apache:branch-2.1 Dec 24, 2024
17 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants