Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replacing gunicornmontor with uvicorn.run() #45103

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vatsrahul1001
Copy link
Collaborator

Related: #43035

These are the stats comparing uvicorn.run() with Gunicorn + GunicornMonitor


Comparison: Uvicorn vs. Gunicorn Performance

Request Statistics

Metric Uvicorn Gunicorn
Total Requests 14,714 14,726
Total Failures 0 13
Average Response Time 12.05 ms 13.46 ms
Min Response Time 7 ms 1 ms
Max Response Time 195 ms 216 ms
Average Size (bytes) 4,608 4,603.93
Requests Per Second (RPS) 49.05 49.09
Failures Per Second 0 0.04

Observations

  1. Response Times:

    • Uvicorn demonstrates slightly lower average and maximum response times compared to Gunicorn.
    • Percentile analysis shows Uvicorn's response times are more consistent, with fewer extreme values at higher percentiles.
  2. Failures:

    • Uvicorn had no failures, whereas Gunicorn recorded 13 failures caused by RemoteDisconnected errors. This could indicate potential issues in connection handling under load.
  3. Performance Consistency:

    • Uvicorn offers better consistency and reliability based on the above data.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@vatsrahul1001 vatsrahul1001 marked this pull request as draft December 20, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant