-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Google Shell Style Compliance #326
chore: Google Shell Style Compliance #326
Conversation
72ceef4
to
d8455f9
Compare
hooks/infracost_breakdown.sh
Outdated
local -r hook_config="$1" | ||
local args | ||
read -r -a args <<< "$2" | ||
read -r -a args <<<"$2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The whitespace reduction changes is what shellcheck GH action refuses to accept.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you please pet linter by reverting such whitespace change along with fix other linter errors and warnings.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -eo pipefail | |||
# Arguments: | |||
# script_dir - absolute path to hook dir location | |||
####################################################################### | |||
function common::initialize { | |||
common::initialize() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The name()
to function name
change was an effort by @MaxymVlasov
Please negotiate this with Max.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, please return function
word. Google style guide do not determine which syntax should be used
About ()
- not sure is it needed. It looks like apendix, during bash not be able to achieve function function_name(var1, var2)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, George mentined that ()
will not works within function
#326 (comment)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -eo pipefail | |||
# Arguments: | |||
# script_dir - absolute path to hook dir location | |||
####################################################################### | |||
function common::initialize { | |||
common::initialize() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, please return function
word. Google style guide do not determine which syntax should be used
About ()
- not sure is it needed. It looks like apendix, during bash not be able to achieve function function_name(var1, var2)
####################################### | ||
# main function | ||
# Globals: | ||
# ARGS | ||
# HOOK_CONFIG | ||
# SCRIPT_DIR | ||
# Arguments: | ||
# None | ||
####################################### |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Too obvious. Not needed
Put an
x
into the box if that apply:Description of your changes
This PR only contains small non-breaking changes. I'll create another PR which will require some careful testing.
#324
How can we test changes