Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CodeAnt AI: Made Changes to the file #134

Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions lib/searchHistory.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ exports.searchList = (args) => {
if (searchList) {
const wordAndMeans = searchList.split('\n');
for (const w of wordAndMeans) {
if (isWordMeanReg.test(w)) {
if (w.startsWith(" ")) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replacing the regex test with w.startsWith(" ") might change the behavior of the code. Ensure that this change is intended and does not break existing functionality.

console.log(WORD_MEAN_SPLIT, chalk.green(w));
} else {
console.log(WORD_MEAN_SPLIT, chalk.yellow(w));
Comment on lines 94 to 100

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The nested loop structure for printing wordAndMeans can be optimized. Currently, it checks each word with startsWith(" ") in every iteration, which can be simplified.

Recommended Solution:
Refactor the loop to reduce the number of conditional checks by separating the words and meanings before the loop.

if (searchList) {
const wordAndMeans = searchList.split('\n');
wordAndMeans.forEach(w => {
const color = w.startsWith("  ") ? chalk.green : chalk.yellow;
console.log(WORD_MEAN_SPLIT, color(w));
});
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -132,4 +132,4 @@ exports.saveHistory = (word, means) => {
} catch (err) {
console.log('save with error: ', err);
}
};
};
Comment on lines 132 to +135

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error handling in the saveHistory function is minimal and only logs the error to the console. This approach may not be sufficient for production environments.

Recommended Solution:
Implement a more robust error handling mechanism, such as retry logic, alerting, or more detailed logging, to ensure that errors are properly managed and do not go unnoticed.

} catch (err) {
console.error('Failed to save history:', err);
// Additional error handling logic such as retry or alerting can be added here
}

Loading