refactor: remove needle and xml2js, use node-fetch and fast-xml-parser #119
Conversation
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:M
WalkthroughThis pull request refactors the codebase by removing the Changes
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@afc163 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Walkthrough本次更改涉及对 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![petercat-assistant[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/875736?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
index.js
Outdated
| spinner.stop(); | ||
| print.iciba(result.dict, options); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.log(error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using console.log for error handling is not recommended for production code. Consider using a proper logging library or mechanism to handle errors more gracefully.
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 73dcf8a in 14 seconds
More details
- Looked at
101lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. index.js:45
- Draft comment:
Consider logging the error in the catch block to provide more context on what went wrong during the fetch request. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is suggesting something that is already implemented in the code. The error is logged using console.log(error), so the suggestion to log the error is redundant.
I might be missing the context of how the error is logged. If the current logging is insufficient, the comment might still be valid.
The use of console.log(error) is a standard way to log errors, and unless there's a specific reason to change it, the comment is unnecessary.
The comment should be deleted because the error is already being logged, making the suggestion redundant.
Workflow ID: wflow_fnLcx0YEOxehQsFd
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected] |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #119 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.55% 91.00% +1.44%
==========================================
Files 5 5
Lines 498 478 -20
==========================================
- Hits 446 435 -11
+ Misses 52 43 -9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
afc163
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f8c5b14 in 19 seconds
More details
- Looked at
24lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. index.js:3
- Draft comment:
Consider using a direct import fornode-fetchinstead of a dynamic import for better readability and performance.
const fetch = require('node-fetch');
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the addition of a dynamic import for 'node-fetch'. The suggestion to use a direct import could improve readability and performance, which are valid concerns. The comment is actionable and clear, suggesting a specific code change.
The comment does not consider potential reasons for using a dynamic import, such as conditional loading or environment-specific requirements. It assumes that a direct import is always better.
While there may be valid reasons for using a dynamic import, the comment provides a clear and actionable suggestion that could be beneficial in many cases. The author can choose to ignore it if they have specific reasons for the current implementation.
The comment is about a change made in the diff and provides a clear, actionable suggestion for improving code quality. It should be kept.
Workflow ID: wflow_09sgEljbmxl7GUAy
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
biome.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonbun.lockbis excluded by!**/bun.lockbpackage.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (2)
- bin/fanyi.js (0 hunks)
- index.js (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- bin/fanyi.js
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
index.js
[warning] 44-44: index.js#L44
Added line #L44 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
index.js (2)
3-3: 更改看起来不错！导入
fast-xml-parser库的XMLParser类，这与 PR 的目标一致，即用fast-xml-parser替换xml2js进行 XML 解析。
34-39: 很好的改进！将
needle库替换为原生的fetchAPI 来发起 HTTP 请求，这是一种更现代的方法。同时，使用fast-xml-parser替换xml2js进行 XML 响应解析，可能会提供更好的性能和简洁性。代码更改实现正确。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on caf5efb in 17 seconds
More details
- Looked at
19lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. index.js:44
- Draft comment:
Consider logging the error for debugging purposes.
console.error(error);
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the removal of error logging. The suggestion to use console.error is a valid code quality improvement, as it provides better error visibility compared to console.log. This is an actionable and clear suggestion.
The comment could be seen as unnecessary if the decision to remove error logging was intentional and aligns with the project's error handling strategy.
The suggestion to use console.error is a common best practice for error handling, and unless there is a specific reason to avoid logging errors, it is a useful improvement.
The comment should be kept as it provides a clear and actionable suggestion to improve error handling by using console.error.
Workflow ID: wflow_2GX9n1Btfp4e71Yj
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 509842d in 18 seconds
More details
- Looked at
23lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. index.js:35
- Draft comment:
Consider importing 'node-fetch' statically instead of dynamically for better performance and readability.
const fetch = require('node-fetch');
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the dynamic import of 'node-fetch'. It suggests a code quality improvement that is actionable and clear. The suggestion does not violate any of the rules provided, as it is not purely informative, speculative, or obvious. It is a valid suggestion for improving code readability and performance.
The comment assumes that a static import is always better, which might not be the case if dynamic imports are used intentionally for reasons like conditional loading. However, the suggestion is still valid as a general code quality improvement.
While dynamic imports can be useful, the suggestion to use a static import is a common practice for better performance and readability, making it a valid comment.
Keep the comment as it suggests a valid code quality improvement related to a change made in the diff.
Workflow ID: wflow_whdmmJWNqGe6T6vH
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
⌛ 6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
refactor: replace needle and xml2js with node-fetch and fast-xml-parser
Summary:
Refactor to replace
needleandxml2jswithnode-fetchandfast-xml-parser, update dependencies, and clean up unused code.Key points:
needlewithfetchfor HTTP requests inindex.js.xml2jswithfast-xml-parserfor XML parsing inindex.js.needleandxml2jsfrompackage.jsondependencies.fast-xml-parserandnode-fetchtopackage.jsondependencies.resolveOptionsandisBooleanfunctions frombin/fanyi.js.biome.jsonto ignorecoveragedirectory.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev