Skip to content

TurboBoost Commands vulnerable to arbitrary method invocation

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 14, 2024 in hopsoft/turbo_boost-commands • Updated Mar 18, 2024

Package

npm @turbo-boost/commands (npm)

Affected versions

< 0.1.3
>= 0.2.0, < 0.2.2

Patched versions

0.1.3
0.2.2
bundler turbo_boost-commands (RubyGems)
< 0.1.3
>= 0.2.0, < 0.2.2
0.1.3
0.2.2

Description

Impact

TurboBoost Commands has existing protections in place to guarantee that only public methods on Command classes can be invoked; however, the existing checks aren't as robust as they should be. It's possible for a sophisticated attacker to invoke more methods than should be permitted depending on the the strictness of authorization checks that individual applications enforce. Being able to call some of these methods can have security implications.

Details

Commands verify that the class must be a Command and that the method requested is defined as a public method; however, this isn't robust enough to guard against all unwanted code execution. The library should more strictly enforce which methods are considered safe before allowing them to be executed.

Patches

Patched in the following versions.

Workarounds

You can add this guard to mitigate the issue if running an unpatched version of the library.

class ApplicationCommand < TurboBoost::Commands::Command
  before_command do
    method_name = params[:name].include?("#") ? params[:name].split("#").last : :perform
    ancestors = self.class.ancestors[0..self.class.ancestors.index(TurboBoost::Commands::Command) - 1]
    allowed = ancestors.any? { |a| a.public_instance_methods(false).any? method_name.to_sym }
    throw :abort unless allowed # ← blocks invocation
    # raise "Invalid Command" unless allowed # ← blocks invocation
  end
end

References

@hopsoft hopsoft published to hopsoft/turbo_boost-commands Mar 14, 2024
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 14, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 15, 2024
Reviewed Mar 15, 2024
Last updated Mar 18, 2024

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.043%
(11th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-28181

GHSA ID

GHSA-mp76-7w5v-pr75
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.