Skip to content

Double free in crossbeam

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 25, 2021 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Nov 10, 2023

Package

cargo crossbeam (Rust)

Affected versions

>= 0.4.0, < 0.4.1

Patched versions

0.4.1

Description

Even if an element is popped from a queue, crossbeam would run its destructor inside the epoch-based garbage collector. This is a source of double frees.

The flaw was corrected by wrapping elements inside queues in a ManuallyDrop.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 26, 2019
Reviewed Aug 19, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 25, 2021
Last updated Nov 10, 2023

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.214%
(59th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2018-20996

GHSA ID

GHSA-c3cw-c387-pj65

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.