-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Saving an activity report feedback #120
Conversation
Remove `--runInBand`, it appears to no longer be needed to prevent a race with tests that hit the database
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a lot cleaner, thanks.
Before merging, the newly renamed activity-recipients.yaml
doc still references the old participant schema. Also, would it be possible to add a quick descriptive sentence at least to each overall object in the API docs, if not each field as well, especially any that aren't obvious.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ | |||
"server:debug": "nodemon src/index.js --exec babel-node --inspect", | |||
"client": "yarn --cwd frontend start", | |||
"test": "jest src", | |||
"test:ci": "cross-env JEST_JUNIT_OUTPUT_DIR=reports JEST_JUNIT_OUTPUT_NAME=unit.xml POSTGRES_USERNAME=postgres POSTGRES_DB=ttasmarthub CURRENT_USER_ID=5 CI=true jest src tools --runInBand --coverage --reporters=default --reporters=jest-junit", | |||
"test:ci": "cross-env JEST_JUNIT_OUTPUT_DIR=reports JEST_JUNIT_OUTPUT_NAME=unit.xml POSTGRES_USERNAME=postgres POSTGRES_DB=ttasmarthub CURRENT_USER_ID=5 CI=true jest src tools --coverage --reporters=default --reporters=jest-junit", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
Found a test that was removing all request errors, which was causing failures when tests were run in parrallel. Was able to update the test enabling parallel test runs
It looks like the
|
Oh forgot to update that whole file! Should be updated now. I had to hard refresh locally to get redoc to show the new changes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
Description of change
--runInBand
, it appears to no longer be needed to prevent a race with tests that hit the databaseHow to test
Pull down, run all tests
Issue(s)