-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"Heading has non-empty accessible name" [ffd0e9]: Update from TF survey #2077
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
4184e81
7fb7a37
4bb3acd
fa5b7bb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ accessibility_requirements: | |
failed: not satisfied | ||
passed: further testing needed | ||
inapplicable: further testing needed | ||
secondary_requirements: | ||
wcag20:1.3.1: # Info and Relationships (A) | ||
wcag-technique:H42: # Using h1-h6 to identify headings | ||
forConformance: false | ||
failed: not satisfied | ||
|
@@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ There are no assumptions. | |
|
||
## Accessibility Support | ||
|
||
- Some assistive technologies may hide headings with empty [accessible name][] from the users. This depends on the user agent, on how the [accessible name][] was computed (the [accessible name and description computation][] is not clear concerning which characters should be trimmed), and on the assistive technology itself. Hence, there are cases where the outcome of this rule is _failed_, but users of certain assistive technology and browser combinations will not experience an issue. | ||
- Some assistive technologies may hide headings with empty [accessible name][] from the users. This depends on the user agent, on how the [accessible name][] was computed (the [accessible name and description computation][] and on the assistive technology itself. Hence, there are cases where the outcome of this rule is _failed_, but users of certain assistive technology and browser combinations will not experience an issue. | ||
ChrisLoiselle marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
- Implementation of [Presentational Roles Conflict Resolution][] varies from one browser or assistive technology to another. Depending on this, some [semantic][semantic role] `heading` elements can fail this rule with some technology but users of other technologies would not experience any accessibility issue because the same elements would have a [semantic role][] of `presentation` and be hidden for these users. | ||
|
||
|
@@ -173,14 +175,6 @@ This `h1` element has an [explicit role][] of `none`. However, the [global][] [p | |
|
||
#### Inapplicable Example 1 | ||
|
||
There is no [semantic][semantic role] `heading` element. | ||
|
||
```html | ||
<div></div> | ||
``` | ||
Comment on lines
-176
to
-180
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Removing this example breaks our own "test case design" guidelines of Test every condition 🤔 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Jym77 We felt this was not a useful test case, so we're thinking of leaving things like this out. Is that OK with you? Happy to update the test ever condition bit then. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @WilcoFiers No strong feeling about that particular example which is, indeed, quite useless 🙂 It's more on the boundaries of things on how we decide that tests are useful or not. => this tends to hint that we may want to have some test cases for the computers and only show a meaningful subset to the humans. |
||
|
||
#### Inapplicable Example 2 | ||
|
||
This `h1` element is not [included in the accessibility tree][]. | ||
|
||
```html | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not the correct syntax. What you should do is replace:
with this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WilcoFiers am I to update within this PR or do I need to create a new one with the desired changes you recommend per secondary requirements? Not sure if you wanted another PR on 7fb7a37 for the highlight you are mentioning in this comment here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No please update in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WilcoFiers when I view the file in "edit file" it shows your changes. I can't approve per admin settings, thus not sure what else to do to "close" this issue and "update the PR" from my side.