Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Resource evaluation should be more transparent #1319

Closed
ericwbailey opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Resource evaluation should be more transparent #1319

ericwbailey opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@ericwbailey
Labels
administration Issues dealing with running the site resource Links to external sites.

Comments

@ericwbailey
Copy link
Member

Our current process for evaluating resources isn't as open as it could be. This includes what we're looking for, and what criteria may cause a rejection (reference Social Media Posts, Promotions, partnership deals, and SEO scams, Plagiarism, and Rejection subsections).

These criteria have mostly been listed as a reaction to submitted content. We should consolidate and publicize our evaluation criteria to make it more understandable and equitable. Also reference #1294 for some adjacent issues to this one.
@ericwbailey ericwbailey added resource Links to external sites. administration Issues dealing with running the site labels Jul 28, 2021
@ericwbailey ericwbailey self-assigned this Oct 11, 2021
@ericwbailey ericwbailey mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2021
Merged
@ericwbailey
Copy link
Member Author

Closed via #1362

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ericwbailey ericwbailey

Labels
administration Issues dealing with running the site resource Links to external sites.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ericwbailey