New Release #512
New Release #512
Conversation
* fix: use diff. idx for deals and activations * test: add test cases for failed activations * test: fix last deal test case
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ziscky, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a critical indexing issue in the deal activation process, ensuring that successful deal activations are always correctly matched with their corresponding data, even when other deals in the same batch fail. The changes include a targeted code fix and expanded test coverage to prevent future regressions and confirm the robustness of the solution.
Highlights
- Corrected Deal Activation Indexing: Implemented a fix in parseActivateDeals to ensure that the activations array is correctly indexed when some deals fail to activate. Previously, a skipped failed deal could cause subsequent successful deals to be processed with incorrect activation data.
- Enhanced Test Coverage for Deal Activations: Added comprehensive test cases to TestActivateDeals to validate the fix, specifically covering scenarios where deal activations fail at the beginning, middle, or end of a batch.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a critical bug in parseActivateDeals that could cause a panic due to an index out of bounds error when handling failed deal activations. The fix is correct and robustly handles cases where the number of activations does not match the number of sectors. The added test cases in deals_test.go are comprehensive, covering failures of the first, middle, and last deals in a batch, which significantly improves test coverage for this logic. I have one suggestion in the test file to improve the quality of the test data. Overall, this is an excellent and necessary fix.
🔗 zboto Link