Remove unused loading of crispy_forms_tags in templates #3194
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports MegaLinter is graciously provided by |
Test results 9 files 9 suites 8m 15s ⏱️ Results for commit 650a801. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3194 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 60.39% 60.39%
=======================================
Files 605 605
Lines 43703 43703
Branches 48 48
=======================================
Hits 26395 26395
Misses 17296 17296
Partials 12 12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
johannaengland
force-pushed
the
cleanup/remove-load-crispy-tag
branch
from
c5009db
to
650a801
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was overlooked in #3185.