Fix missing form inputs in RoomFilterForm and NetboxTypeFilterForm in seeddb

[podliashanyk]

To fix general bug that was introduced in #3126.

http://localhost/seeddb/type/
http://localhost/seeddb/room/

UI Before fix:

[github-actions]

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor	Linter	Files	Fixed	Errors	Elapsed time
✅ PYTHON	black	992		0	11.26s
✅ PYTHON	ruff	987		0	0.1s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

MegaLinter is graciously provided by

[github-actions]

Test results

    9 files      9 suites   8m 47s ⏱️
2 138 tests 2 138 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
4 015 runs  4 015 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 111e075.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.39%. Comparing base (b8fec64) to head (111e075).
Report is 64 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3178      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.40%   60.39%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         605      605              
  Lines       43710    43703       -7     
  Branches       48       48              
==========================================
- Hits        26401    26394       -7     
  Misses      17297    17297              
  Partials       12       12              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[johannaengland]

Good catch! No idea how this slipped my notice while working on #3126.

[johannaengland]

But actually thinking about the general principle of the function get_single_layout - if we give the opportunity of actually having a list as parameter, that defeats the purpose of it being for a single filter - we will either have to change the docstring and possibly even name of the function or go only allow one field as input

[johannaengland]

Sorry for the back and forth in reviews 😅

[podliashanyk]

Good catch! No idea how this slipped my notice while working on #3126.

It also slipped through mine and @stveit notice as well since we both approved that PR. A collective lapse in criticism 😄

[podliashanyk]

Sorry for the back and forth in reviews 😅

No problem! 😌

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud