Bug fix: TTF extension was wrong. update font types, add OTF type.

[galenhuntington]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

@galenhuntington It appears that this is your first contribution to the project, welcome.

With apologies for the bureaucracy, please could you prepare a separate PR to the 'tiddlywiki-com' branch with your signature for the Contributor License Agreement (see contributing.md).

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for tiddlywiki-previews ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	f77d33a
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/tiddlywiki-previews/deploys/678fd607de845500084e5d45
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-8898--tiddlywiki-previews.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[pmario]

I think we need to have a closer look.
May be the mime types have to be extended. See: https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml#font

Also see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8081.html

[pmario]

application/font-woff is deprecated

application/x-font-xxx does not exist -- They are TW application specific.

[github-actions]

galenhuntington has signed the Contributor License Agreement (see contributing.md)

[Jermolene]

Hi @galenhuntington – it is not clear why this mapping of .woff -> application/x-font-ttf was originally included, 4 years after the original support for WOFF fonts. I'm pretty sure it was intended as a hack because of the use of the non-standard MIME type. However, I note that $tw.utils.getFileExtensionInfo(".woff") currently returns {type: 'application/x-font-ttf'}, which seems definitively incorrect.

At this point, I think it probably makes sense to correct the MIME type as well as the file extension:

$tw.utils.registerFileType("application/font-ttf","base64",".ttf");

Perhaps it would be worth a systematic review of the MIME types that we use. According to Wikipedia, the MIME type for WOFF fonts has recently changed from application/font-woff to font/woff.

[galenhuntington]

I assumed that 57e1fc6 was simply a cut and paste error. The previous line was copied and edited but the extension was inadvertently not changed.

The application/ types for fonts are obsolete but I expect browsers will still recognize them. However, it is better they be updated, so I did that in my newest commit. I also added a MIME type for OTF.