Support port checkers #2210
Draft
Support port checkers #2210
+52
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ture. The python testing scripts I am using are on another branch because I don't want to merge them in through the PR
Measurity
requested changes
Dec 20, 2024
Co-authored-by: Measurity <[email protected]>
…ged data to blank array so LiteNetLib ignores it Co-authored-by: Measurity <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Measurity <[email protected]>
|
Tested on my end(just that the feature itself is working), should be good for re-review |
|
On hold until new launcher is merged as discussed on Discord. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes issue #2160
The only port checker I have gotten to work with this so far is this one:
https://pentest-tools.com/network-vulnerability-scanning/udp-port-scanner-online-nmap