-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose non-nullable configuration to remove AOT limiting null check #2514
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f73cdb0
Expose non-nullable configuration to remove null check
JimBobSquarePants 6072d3a
Merge branch 'main' into js/smaller-aot
JimBobSquarePants d1ab884
Merge branch 'main' into js/smaller-aot
JimBobSquarePants 7e8dca2
Update GifEncoderCore.cs
JimBobSquarePants 64d9d5f
Merge branch 'main' into js/smaller-aot
JimBobSquarePants 7f2ab0c
Update PngEncoder.cs
JimBobSquarePants a794ac1
Merge branch 'main' into js/smaller-aot
JimBobSquarePants 8908dba
Minor AOT fixes and .NET 7 fixes.
JimBobSquarePants File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should probably leave these in despite then no longer being needed for backwards compatability, anyone with a dependency on this public API will break otherwise, shoudl mark them
Obsolete
insteadThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are several breaking changes coming to 3.1 already without obsoletion eg. #2455 or #2485. I see little point using Obsolete selectively.
What is worrying me is that the net amount of breaking changes between 3.0.* -> 3.1.0 is much bigger than between 2.0.* -> 2.1.0. Maybe we should rename 3.1 to 4.0 to avoid confusion?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My plan with major versions has always been to support latest the .NET LTS version. There are breaking changes (unfortunately more than I'd like), but they typically only affect scenarios involving advanced behavior.