Improve static analysis: add JET tests and fix undefined variable issues #511
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR improves static analysis compatibility by adding JET.jl tests and fixing several issues identified during JET analysis.
Changes
JET.jl Integration:
Bug Fixes (addressing JET warnings):
getindexmethod forUserFunctionAndDatato supportuserfun[]syntax used inkinsolfuncvode!for unrecognized integrator type (was undefined variable)__initfor unrecognized algorithm type (was undefined variable)JET Issues Addressed
The following JET reports are now handled:
MethodErrorReportforgetindex(::UserFunctionAndData)UndefVarErrorReportformem_ptrincvode!with unknown integratorUndefVarErrorReportforalg_codein__initwith unknown algorithmUndefVarErrorReportforf!with unsupported function typesTest Results
All tests pass including the new JET tests:
Test plan
Pkg.test()to verify all existing tests passcc @ChrisRackauckas
🤖 Generated with Claude Code