-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 394
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add throttle operator #515
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hmmm, not quite sure why the Travis build fails. It's only one and it fails to install |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is greatly appreciated!
auto localState = state; | ||
|
||
const auto tp = localState->worker.now().time_since_epoch(); | ||
std::cout << "on_next(" << v << ") at " << tp.count() / 1000000 << " throttled: " << (localState->throttled ? "true" : "false") << std::endl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please remove std::cout
usage
auto work = [v, localState](const rxsc::schedulable&) { | ||
auto produce_time = localState->worker.now() + localState->period; | ||
|
||
std::cout << "scheduling unthrottle for " << (produce_time.time_since_epoch().count() / 1000000) << std::endl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please remove std::cout
usage
localState->throttled = true; | ||
|
||
state->dest.on_next(v); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the call to on_next is not necessarily on the same worker. the following needs to be scheduled on the worker.
if (!localState->throttled) {
localState->throttled = true;
state->dest.on_next(v);
}
It would be more efficient to check throttled
first and then only schedule state->dest.on_next(v);
when throttled == false
. To do that throttled would need to be std::atomic<bool>
.
Any news on this PR? Could |
I'm used to RxJS and loved the concept, so I wanted to use it in C++ as well. Seeing #501, I thought this would be a good opportunity for me to get a little deeper into understanding the implementation of RxCpp.
This is mostly a copy&paste of the
debounce
operator implementation, edited to implementthrottle
semantics (ref. RxJS).The
throttle
operator re-emits the first value emitted by the source, then swallows all following emissions until the specified timeout has occurred. After that, the next value emitted by the source is emitted again and the cycle continues.The RxJS implementation also supports emitting the last value emitted by the source when the timeout completes. If this is a feature you would like to see, I can add support for that as well.