🚀 spec-driven-ai

Outcome-Driven Specifications for AI Agent Infrastructure

spec-driven-ai explores the convergence of specification-as-code, structured validation loops, and outcome-driven infrastructure management. Inspired by Sean Grove's OpenAI presentation on specification-as-code, this testbed systematically validates how natural language outcome specifications can drive AI agent execution through pragmatic scaffolding and comprehensive observability.

🎯 Project Purpose

This research testbed validates a fundamental shift from traditional Infrastructure-as-Code to Outcome-as-Code: SMEs specify what they want to achieve, while AI agents determine how to implement it through systematic validation loops and persistent state management.

Core Innovation: Outcome Specification

Rather than specifying implementation details, we define desired outcomes:

# Traditional approach (HOW)
- Install Docker
- Configure nginx container  
- Set up port forwarding
- Configure health checks

# Our approach (WHAT)
goal: |
  Deploy a web service that responds to HTTP requests
  on port 80 with 99.9% uptime and sub-100ms response times

validation:
  - Service responds successfully to health checks
  - Performance metrics meet SLA requirements
  - Container restarts automatically on failure

Methodology Convergence

Sean Grove's specification-as-code concepts merge with our existing patterns:

📝 LangGPT: Structured prompt engineering for consistent AI interactions
✅ RAVGV: Request-Analyze-Verify-Generate-Validate loops with human oversight
🎯 Outcome Focus: Version the specification, abstract the implementation
🏗️ Pragmatic Scaffolding: Build methodically, validate each component

Why This Testbed Matters

🧪 Controlled Validation: Single-VM environment proves outcome-driven specifications work
📊 Full Observability: Comprehensive monitoring and logging validates every agent action
🔄 State Persistence: Local infrastructure tracks agent communication and decisions
🚀 Expansion Pathway: Foundation for multi-agent crews with specialized personas

🏗️ Current Architecture

Local Infrastructure Stack

spec-driven-ai operates as a self-contained testbed with comprehensive infrastructure for agent state management, communication, and observability.

graph TD
    A[SME Outcome Specification<br/>🎯 What, Not How] --> B[RAVGV Validation<br/>✅ Human Oversight Loops]
    B --> C[Agent Execution<br/>🤖 Implementation Discovery]
    C --> D[Local State Management<br/>🗄️ Multi-Database Stack]
    D --> E[Repository Sync<br/>🔄 Latest Code Access]
    E --> F[Comprehensive Monitoring<br/>📊 Full Stack Observability]
    F --> G[Outcome Validation<br/>✅ Results Verification]
    
    style A fill:#e3f2fd
    style B fill:#fff3e0
    style G fill:#e8f5e8
    style D fill:#fce4ec

Infrastructure Components

Component	Technology	Agent Purpose	Status
State Storage	PostgreSQL + pgvector	Specification history, agent decisions	✅ Active
Document Store	MongoDB	Flexible configuration and logs	✅ Available
Cache Layer	DragonflyDB	Real-time agent communication	✅ Available
Knowledge Graph	Neo4j	Dependency tracking, future RAG	✅ Available
Repository Sync	Git automation	Agents access latest specifications	🔄 Development
Monitoring Stack	Grafana + Prometheus + Loki	Full system observability	✅ Operational

Agent Tool Connectivity

🔧 MCP Server Network:

bash-desktop-commander: Secure shell execution with jailed environments
monitoring-stack: Real-time system metrics and log access
database-management: Direct database operations and queries
repository-operations: Git operations and code synchronization

🛠️ Outcome Specification Framework

Specification Structure

Our outcome-driven specifications abstract implementation while maintaining validation requirements:

# infrastructure-outcome-spec.yaml
spec_id: monitoring-observability
version: 2.1
author: platform-team
session: session-02-discovery

outcome: |
  Provide real-time observability into all infrastructure services
  with sub-5-second metric collection and 30-day log retention

success_criteria:
  performance:
    - Metric collection interval: ≤ 5 seconds
    - Dashboard load time: ≤ 2 seconds  
    - Alert response time: ≤ 30 seconds
  reliability:
    - 99.9% service uptime
    - Zero data loss during service restarts
    - Automatic recovery from component failures
  usability:
    - Single dashboard for all services
    - Natural language alert descriptions
    - Mobile-responsive interface

constraints:
  - Container-based deployment only
  - Resource usage ≤ 2GB RAM total
  - All data encrypted at rest
  - No external dependencies

implementation_freedom:
  - Agent chooses specific monitoring tools
  - Database schema design at agent discretion  
  - Network configuration determined by agent
  - Security implementation details flexible

validation_checkpoints:
  - V1: Human reviews implementation plan
  - V2: Human validates deployed outcome

Specification Evolution

📈 Phase Progression:

File-Based Specs: Current YAML/Markdown with Git versioning
Database-Backed: Structured storage with query capabilities
Agent-Generated: AI agents create specifications from natural language
Multi-Agent Crews: Specialized personas collaborate on complex outcomes

Repository Synchronization

The entire repository is regularly cloned to the server infrastructure, enabling:

Agent Access: Latest specifications and templates always available
Autonomous Development: Agents may eventually create PRs and push code
State Consistency: All agents work from same knowledge base
Collaborative Learning: Agents observe and learn from each other's work

🔄 Development Sessions

Pragmatic Scaffolding Approach

Development advances through structured sessions, each validating specific capabilities:

✅ Session 1: MCP Foundation (Complete)

Validation: RAVGV cycle works with outcome specifications
Achievement: "Deploy those MCP servers" → operational monitoring stack
Learning: Natural language outcomes reliably translate to working infrastructure
Foundation: Established baseline for agent tool connectivity

🔄 Session 2: State & Discovery (Active)

Focus: Database integration for agent state management and specification discovery
Objective: Agents can persist decisions, discover existing specifications
Components: PostgreSQL schema design, specification indexing, search capabilities
Timeline: 2-week development cycle with systematic validation

⏳ Session 3: Multi-Agent Coordination (Planned)

Goal: Multiple specialized agents collaborate on complex outcomes
Capabilities: Agent-to-agent communication, task delegation, conflict resolution
Infrastructure: Enhanced state management, agent persona development
Validation: Complex multi-service deployments with agent collaboration

Current Research Questions

📊 Session 2 Investigations:

Specification Discovery: How effectively can agents find and reuse existing outcome specifications?
State Persistence: What agent decision history enables improved future performance?
Knowledge Evolution: How do specifications improve through agent feedback and iteration?
Communication Patterns: What state sharing enables effective agent coordination?

📊 Comprehensive Observability

Full Stack Monitoring

📈 Unprecedented Visibility:

Performance Monitoring: Real-time metrics for all infrastructure components
Log Aggregation: Centralized logging with natural language search
Agent Activity Tracking: Complete audit trail of all agent decisions and actions
Outcome Validation: Continuous verification that desired results are maintained

Monitoring Architecture

monitoring-stack/
├── grafana/           # Visualization and dashboards
├── prometheus/        # Metrics collection and alerting
├── loki/             # Log aggregation and search
└── promtail/         # Log shipping and processing

📊 Key Metrics:

Specification Success Rate: Percentage of outcomes achieved on first attempt
Agent Performance: Response time, resource usage, error rates
System Health: Infrastructure uptime, capacity utilization
Human Validation Time: Efficiency of RAVGV checkpoint processes

Agent Observability

Every agent action is comprehensively logged and monitored:

Decision Tracking: Why agents chose specific implementation approaches
Tool Usage: MCP server utilization patterns and success rates
State Changes: Database modifications and reasoning
Outcome Verification: Continuous validation of desired results

📁 Repository Structure

spec-driven-ai/
├── 📚 docs/                          # Framework documentation and methodology
│   ├── databases/                     # Multi-database deployment guides
│   │   ├── postgresql-pgvector/       # Agent state and vector search
│   │   ├── mongodb/                   # Document storage and configuration
│   │   ├── dragonflydb/              # Real-time agent communication
│   │   └── neo4j/                    # Knowledge graphs and dependencies
│   ├── mcp-servers/                  # Agent tool connectivity
│   │   ├── bash-desktop-commander/   # Secure command execution
│   │   ├── monitoring-stack/         # System observability
│   │   └── dragonflydb-redis-mcp/    # Cache operations
│   └── monitoring-stack/             # Full observability deployment
├── 📝 specs/                         # Outcome specification templates
│   ├── database-spec-template.md     # Database deployment outcomes
│   ├── mcp-server-spec-template.md   # MCP server specifications
│   └── agents01-vm-specs.md          # VM infrastructure outcomes
├── 🚀 projects/                      # Session-based development
│   └── spec-driven-ai-framework/     # Core framework evolution
│       ├── framework-evolution/       # Architecture progression
│       └── sessions/                 # Structured validation sessions
│           ├── session-01-mcp-foundation/    # Foundation validation
│           └── session-02-databases-and-documentation/  # Current focus
├── 📊 tree.txt                       # Repository structure snapshot
├── 📋 README.md                      # This documentation
└── 🛡️ LICENSE                        # MIT License

Agent Workspace

The synchronized repository provides agents with:

Latest Specifications: Always current outcome definitions and templates
Historical Context: Previous implementations and lessons learned
Collaborative Knowledge: Shared understanding across agent crews
Autonomous Potential: Foundation for agent-initiated development

🔗 Ecosystem Context

Proxmox Astronomy Lab Integration

spec-driven-ai operates as a specialized research environment within the astronomy infrastructure:

🏠 Host Infrastructure: proxmox-astronomy-lab - Enterprise-grade cluster providing VM hosting
🔮 Methodological Foundation: the-crystal-forge - RAVGV development and validation
🌌 Real-World Application: DESI research projects - Production workloads demonstrating practical application

Future Multi-Agent Vision

🤖 Specialized Agent Crews:

Infrastructure Persona: System deployment, monitoring, security hardening
Data Engineering Persona: Database optimization, ETL pipeline development
Research Assistant Persona: Scientific workflow automation, analysis pipeline development
Documentation Persona: Knowledge management, specification refinement

🧠 Agent Intelligence Infrastructure:

Individual RAG: Each agent maintains specialized knowledge stores
Shared Knowledge Graphs: Collaborative understanding of system dependencies
Communication Protocols: Structured agent-to-agent interaction patterns
Learning Systems: Continuous improvement through outcome validation

🛡️ Security & Validation

Outcome-Driven Security

Security specifications focus on desired security posture rather than implementation details:

security_outcome: |
  Ensure all services operate with minimal privilege
  and comprehensive audit logging

security_validation:
  - No services run as root
  - All network traffic encrypted
  - Complete audit trail of all operations
  - Automated vulnerability scanning passes

Validation Framework

✅ RAVGV Implementation:

Request: SME specifies desired outcome
Analyze: Agent researches implementation options and creates plan
Verify: Human reviews plan before execution (V1 checkpoint)
Generate: Agent implements solution and configures infrastructure
Validate: Human confirms outcome achieved (V2 checkpoint)

Comprehensive Audit Trail

Specification Versioning: Complete history of outcome definitions
Agent Decision Logging: Why specific implementation choices were made
System State Tracking: Database of all infrastructure modifications
Human Oversight Records: All validation checkpoint decisions and reasoning

🚀 Getting Started

Development Environment

Prerequisites:

Access to spec-driven-ai VM within Proxmox Astronomy Lab infrastructure
Docker and Docker Compose for local service orchestration
Git for specification versioning and repository synchronization
Database client tools for infrastructure state inspection

Quick Validation

1. Repository Synchronization:

# Clone and sync repository
git clone https://github.com/Proxmox-Astronomy-Lab/spec-driven-ai.git
cd spec-driven-ai

# Verify repository sync to server
cat projects/spec-driven-ai-framework/sessions/session-02*/README.md

2. Infrastructure Stack:

# Deploy comprehensive database stack
cd docs/databases/postgresql-pgvector/
./deploy.sh && ./verify-stack.sh

# Verify monitoring observability
cd docs/monitoring-stack/
docker-compose ps

3. Outcome Specification Testing:

# Review specification templates
ls specs/*.md

# Test MCP server connectivity
cd docs/mcp-servers/bash-desktop-commander/
docker exec bash-desktop-commander-mcp whoami

Creating Outcome Specifications

Example Outcome Definition:

spec_id: test-web-service
version: 1.0
author: development-team

outcome: |
  Deploy a responsive web service that serves static content
  with automatic failover and performance monitoring

success_criteria:
  performance:
    - Page load time: < 200ms
    - 99.9% uptime target
    - Automatic restart on failure
  functionality:
    - Serves static HTML content
    - Responsive to health checks
    - Accessible on port 80

constraints:
  - Container-based deployment
  - Resource usage < 512MB RAM
  - Non-root execution required

validation:
  - V1: Human reviews implementation approach
  - V2: Human confirms service operational

🎯 Current Research Focus

Session 2: State Management & Discovery

🔬 Active Investigations:

Agent State Persistence: How agents maintain context across interactions
Specification Discovery: Natural language search for existing outcome specifications
Knowledge Evolution: How specifications improve through agent learning
Multi-Database Coordination: Optimal data distribution across PostgreSQL, MongoDB, DragonflyDB, Neo4j

Validation Metrics

📊 Success Criteria:

Outcome Achievement Rate: >95% of specifications result in desired outcomes
Agent Decision Quality: <10% of V1 checkpoint rejections
System Reliability: 99.9% infrastructure uptime during agent operations
Knowledge Persistence: <2 second response time for specification queries

Future Research Directions

🔮 Multi-Agent Coordination:

Persona Development: Specialized agent roles and capabilities
Collaborative Workflows: Complex outcomes requiring multiple agent coordination
Autonomous Development: Agents creating specifications and implementations independently
Continuous Learning: System-wide improvement through outcome validation feedback

🤝 Contributing

Research Methodology

🧪 Pragmatic Scaffolding: Systematic validation of each component before integration
📖 Outcome Documentation: Complete specification of desired results and success criteria
✅ Validation-Driven: Human oversight ensures quality and safety
🔍 Full Observability: Comprehensive monitoring and logging of all system activity

Current Collaboration Opportunities

🛠️ Technical Development:

Specification Templates: Standard outcome formats for different infrastructure domains
Agent Tool Development: MCP servers for specialized agent capabilities
Database Schema Design: Optimal state management for agent coordination
Monitoring Enhancement: Advanced observability and performance tracking

📚 Research & Documentation:

Outcome Pattern Analysis: Successful specification structures and validation approaches
Agent Behavior Studies: Decision-making patterns and learning effectiveness
Multi-Agent Coordination: Collaborative workflow design and conflict resolution
Security Framework: Outcome-driven security specification and validation

📄 License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

🌟 Acknowledgments

spec-driven-ai demonstrates systematic validation of outcome-driven infrastructure specification through AI agent execution. Built on proven containerization, comprehensive observability, and structured validation loops, this testbed establishes foundation patterns for scalable human-AI collaboration in infrastructure management.

Key Inspirations:

Sean Grove & OpenAI - Specification-as-code vision and outcome-driven development patterns
LangGPT Community - Structured prompting methodologies for consistent AI interactions
GitOps Movement - Version-controlled infrastructure and declarative deployment principles
Model Context Protocol - Standardized AI agent tool connectivity and secure execution

🚀 Outcome-driven infrastructure through systematic AI collaboration | Part of Proxmox Astronomy Lab

Pragmatic scaffolding for multi-agent futures with comprehensive observability

Documentation generated July 14, 2025

Name		Name	Last commit message	Last commit date
Latest commit History 2 Commits
docs		docs
projects		projects
specs		specs
.gitignore		.gitignore
.markdownlint.json		.markdownlint.json
LICENSE		LICENSE
README.md		README.md
tree.txt		tree.txt

License

Pxomox-Astronomy-Lab/spec-driven-ai

Folders and files

Latest commit

History

Repository files navigation