Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @safaricd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a critical bug related to timestamp comparisons within the system's extensions. By standardizing the timezone awareness of dates before comparison, it prevents erroneous calculations that could arise from mixing timezone-aware and unaware datetime objects. The change ensures the reliability of time-based logic in the affected components. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses an issue with comparing timezone-aware and naive datetime objects for the install_date. The change ensures install_date is timezone-aware before comparison, preventing a TypeError. However, my review found that this fix is incomplete. The same potential error exists for other datetime properties loaded from the application state, such as last_prompted_at and last_pinged_at, which are also compared with timezone-aware datetimes. I've left a comment with more details and recommend applying the fix consistently to all relevant datetime properties to fully resolve the issue.
Change Description
This fixes an issue where we were trying to compare UTC-aware and unaware timestamps, reported by some of the users. This particular part of the code only gets triggered in the extensions.
Importantly - this PR also contains an unrelated change; namely the
runtime_environmentattribute that we attach to each base event.