Skip to content

Conversation

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

do a full clone in job pull-unit-test.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2025

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

  1. Overview:

    • The PR updates the clone_depth value in the latest-presubmits.yaml file for the pull-unit-test job in the prow-jobs/pingcap/tidb-engine-ext directory. The change sets clone_depth to 0 to perform a full clone instead of the previous value of 1.
  2. Code Quality:

    • Readability: The code change is straightforward and easy to understand. The comment added helps clarify the purpose of setting clone_depth to 0.
    • Consistency: The change maintains consistency within the file by updating the existing configuration.
    • Efficiency: Performing a full clone (clone_depth: 0) may increase the time taken for cloning the repository but ensures a complete history for the job.
    • Maintainability: The change is minimal and does not affect the overall structure of the configuration file.
  3. Functionality:

    • Correctness: The change to set clone_depth to 0 will indeed result in a full clone of the repository for the pull-unit-test job.
    • Completeness: The PR focuses on a specific configuration change, and there are no additional changes that could affect other parts of the system.
    • Testing: Since this is a configuration change, testing would involve verifying that the pull-unit-test job now performs a full clone as intended.
  4. Documentation:

    • Comments: The added comment # do a full clone. is helpful in understanding the purpose of changing clone_depth.
    • Documentation: If there are any user-facing documentation related to job configurations, it should be updated to reflect the new behavior.
  5. Security:

    • No security concerns are introduced by this configuration change.
  6. Suggestions:

    • Consider updating any relevant documentation to reflect the change made in the latest-presubmits.yaml file.
    • Ensure that the impact of performing a full clone (increased time and resource usage) is acceptable for the pull-unit-test job.
    • If there are specific reasons for switching to a full clone, documenting those reasons could be beneficial for future reference.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @wuhuizuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request updates the latest-presubmits.yaml file for the tidb-engine-ext project. The change modifies the pull-unit-test job to perform a full clone instead of a shallow clone. This is achieved by setting clone_depth to 0.

Highlights

  • Prow Job Configuration: The pull request modifies the prow job configuration file latest-presubmits.yaml.
  • Full Clone: The pull-unit-test job is updated to perform a full clone by setting clone_depth to 0.

Changelog

  • prow-jobs/pingcap/tidb-engine-ext/latest-presubmits.yaml
    • Changed clone_depth from 1 to 0 for the pull-unit-test job, enabling a full clone.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


The clone depth set,
A full history to get,
No shallow commit,
The tests must all fit,
Complete context, no regret.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Apr 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request updates the latest-presubmits.yaml file to perform a full clone in the pull-unit-test job. This change aims to ensure that all necessary git history is available during the unit test execution. The change itself is straightforward, but it's important to consider the potential impact on the job's performance and resource consumption.

Merge Readiness

The change appears to be straightforward and addresses the stated goal of performing a full clone in the pull-unit-test job. Given the absence of any identified critical or high severity issues, the pull request seems reasonable for merging. However, it's advisable to monitor the job's performance after the change to ensure that the full clone doesn't introduce any unexpected overhead. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2025

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

1. Overview:
The pull request updates the latest-presubmits.yaml file in the prow-jobs/pingcap/tidb-engine-ext directory to change the clone_depth value from 1 to 0 in the pull-unit-test job.

2. Code Quality:

  • Readability: The code changes are clear and easy to understand. The comment added for clone_depth: 0 provides good clarification.
  • Consistency: The code maintains consistency within the file by following the existing style and formatting.
  • Efficiency: Updating clone_depth to 0 for a full clone might improve the efficiency of the job pull-unit-test by ensuring a complete clone of the repository.
  • Maintainability: The change seems to improve the maintainability of the job configuration by explicitly specifying a full clone.

3. Functionality:

  • Correctness: The change to set clone_depth to 0 should ensure a full clone of the repository for the pull-unit-test job, as indicated in the PR description.
  • Completeness: It seems that the PR addresses the specific requirement of doing a full clone for the pull-unit-test job. No additional edge cases or scenarios seem relevant based on the provided diff.
  • Testing: It is assumed that there are existing tests for the job configuration, and this change does not introduce new functionality that requires additional testing.

4. Documentation:

  • Comments: The added comment for clone_depth: 0 provides good context for the change.
  • Documentation: No updates to external documentation (e.g., README) are mentioned in the PR description, but they might not be necessary for this specific change.

5. Security:
No security concerns are introduced by this specific change.

6. Suggestions:

  • Consider adding a brief description in the PR description regarding the purpose or reasoning behind the need for a full clone in the pull-unit-test job.
  • Ensure that any necessary testing related to the pull-unit-test job configuration is updated or added if needed.
  • If applicable, update any relevant documentation to reflect the change in the clone_depth value.

@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2025 06:01
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • prow-jobs/pingcap/tidb-engine-ext/OWNERS: Language not supported

Copy link
Contributor

@CalvinNeo CalvinNeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@CalvinNeo: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

Details

In response to this:

lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo added the lgtm label Apr 10, 2025
@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CalvinNeo, wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Apr 10, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 04b911a into main Apr 10, 2025
2 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the wuhuizuo-patch-2 branch April 10, 2025 07:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants