-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
feat: add permission condition coverage to coverage command #2792
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
285729101
wants to merge
1
commit into
Permify:master
Choose a base branch
from
285729101:feat/coverage-command-enhancement
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+315
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 23362
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 3595
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 1094
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 3257
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 647
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 2551
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 146
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 6272
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 6151
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 293
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 1793
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: Permify/permify
Length of output: 1288
ComputedUserSetcan reference a permission, not just a relation — unconditionally labeling it as"relation"causes false "uncovered" reports.In Permify's DSL, a
ComputedUserSetleaf can refer to either a relation or another permission (e.g.,permission group_member = group.memberwherememberis a permission). TheEntityDefinition.Referencesmap distinguishes these viaREFERENCE_PERMISSIONandREFERENCE_RELATIONtypes. Currently,leafToComponentunconditionally assignsType: "relation"to allComputedUserSetleaves. SinceisComponentCoveredonly handles"relation","tuple_to_userset","attribute", and"call"types, any permission reference is reported as uncovered—which is incorrect.Consult
entityDef.GetReferences()[cus.GetRelation()]to distinguish the two cases. For permission-referencing leaves, assign a distinct type (e.g.,"permission") and handle it inisComponentCoveredas always covered (analogous to"call"), since the referenced permission gets its own separate coverage entry.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents