Skip to content

Conversation

@bnjmnp
Copy link

@bnjmnp bnjmnp commented Dec 15, 2021

With d9ebdc9 the FOE part of the API changed a bit, but the application was not updated.

With d9ebdc9 the FOE part of the API changed a bit, but the application was not updated.
@nakarlsson
Copy link
Contributor

For this particular example we could also add that it will abort with Error if not in BOOTSTRAP state.
Makes the sample more clear if some might wonder why it is missing. Of course, as a static variable it would be 0'ed by crt as part of .bss otherwise.

.write_only_in_boot = 1;

To demonstrate the use of of the `write_only_in_boot` FoE file configuration.
@bnjmnp
Copy link
Author

bnjmnp commented Dec 16, 2021

Good point, I just added what you suggested.

@bnjmnp
Copy link
Author

bnjmnp commented Jan 19, 2025

Hi there! I was wondering if there are any updates or specific reasons why this hasn't been merged yet. Is there anything I can do to help move it forward?

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants