-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
29 additions
and
16 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
----------------------- | ||
HUB TOOLBOX VERSION 2 | ||
November 5, 2013 | ||
----------------------- | ||
------------------------- | ||
HUB TOOLBOX VERSION 2.1 | ||
October 16, 2015 | ||
------------------------- | ||
|
||
This is the HUB TOOLBOX for Matlab/Octave | ||
(c) 2013, Dominik Schnitzer <[email protected]> | ||
|
@@ -65,36 +65,49 @@ selection challenge. | |
http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Dexter | ||
|
||
|
||
>> hubness_analysis | ||
|
||
NO PARAMETERS GIVEN! Loading & evaluating DEXTER data set. | ||
|
||
DEXTER is a text classification problem in a bag-of-word | ||
representation. This is a two-class classification problem | ||
with sparse continuous input variables. | ||
This dataset is one of five datasets of the NIPS 2003 feature | ||
selection challenge. | ||
|
||
http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Dexter | ||
|
||
|
||
Hubness Analysis | ||
|
||
ORIGINAL DATA: | ||
data set hubness (S^n=5) : 4.22 | ||
% of anti-hubs at k=5 : 26.67% | ||
% of k=5-NN lists the largest hub occurs: 23.67% | ||
k=5-NN classification accurracy : 56.67% | ||
k=5-NN classification accuracy : 80.33% | ||
Goodman-Kruskal index (higher=better) : 0.104 | ||
original dimensionality : 300 | ||
original dimensionality : 20000 | ||
intrinsic dimensionality estimate : 161 | ||
|
||
MUTUAL PROXIMITY (Empiric/Slow): | ||
data set hubness (S^n=5) : 0.58 | ||
data set hubness (S^n=5) : 0.64 | ||
% of anti-hubs at k=5 : 3.33% | ||
% of k=5-NN lists the largest hub occurs: 5.67% | ||
k=5-NN classification accurracy : 67.00% | ||
Goodman-Kruskal index (higher=better) : 0.136 | ||
% of k=5-NN lists the largest hub occurs: 6.00% | ||
k=5-NN classification accuracy : 90.00% | ||
Goodman-Kruskal index (higher=better) : 0.132 | ||
|
||
LOCAL SCALING (Original, k=10): | ||
data set hubness (S^n=5) : 1.42 | ||
% of anti-hubs at k=5 : 5.33% | ||
% of k=5-NN lists the largest hub occurs: 7.67% | ||
k=5-NN classification accurracy : 66.00% | ||
k=5-NN classification accuracy : 86.00% | ||
Goodman-Kruskal index (higher=better) : 0.156 | ||
|
||
SHARED NEAREST NEIGHBORS (k=10): | ||
data set hubness (S^n=5) : 1.55 | ||
% of anti-hubs at k=5 : 7.00% | ||
% of k=5-NN lists the largest hub occurs: 7.33% | ||
k=5-NN classification accurracy : 60.67% | ||
Goodman-Kruskal index (higher=better) : 0.369 | ||
data set hubness (S^n=5) : 1.77 | ||
% of anti-hubs at k=5 : 5.67% | ||
% of k=5-NN lists the largest hub occurs: 8.67% | ||
k=5-NN classification accuracy : 73.33% | ||
Goodman-Kruskal index (higher=better) : 0.152 | ||
|
||
>> |