Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #1286: String Collections support in $select. #1282
Fixes #1286: String Collections support in $select. #1282
Changes from all commits
de5f4ec
6f942d2
3af92c9
d0d3d3c
7610be8
b88ac4a
9344803
d2b2c45
633e00d
5f90a20
9212f3a
cb9c48e
30fa2c3
7bee0a6
32fe60a
a13ded0
b5f1d0f
9681c4a
b6c0bdb
c77b615
e96ca7d
2a1ea20
dcd6a3d
a44cafe
446ae87
6b9f717
8888e28
504072c
cce4459
6896036
a19a6f6
f1615dd
3d44407
62d19d8
eeadc22
d16f188
e3daf8a
11374e0
825d791
d221a05
a166c04
4fd88a8
e2e08c5
3599fbf
05af092
093078f
cc6531c
3fdfd3c
471b4dd
0180f05
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Team had a concern about
Uri
We currently do not support Uri as a primitive type @gathogojr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WanjohiSammy Then why didn't you just say so? thought we'd already discussed this. But lets discuss it again.
Personally, I don't consider even
string
a primitive type, and neither does anyone else in our profession. But for the purpose of the task at hand, it is and the documentation for ASP NET Core says so. Just like it says the same thing forUri
. If it's too concerning, we can remove this for now and wait for someone else to attempt to add it back a few PRs down the line.With all due respect sir, this is actually a pretty major bug, on our last stable version, that has been fixed since June but we are not rolling it out for unknown reasons. Me and my team are personally suffering from this enough to be using a fork in our project. And there could be people out there who have been experiencing this ever since it was first released.
All I am saying is I would appreciate us doing anything we can to move things along. Which means that if a line of code that adds an extra case for the URL type bothers the team so much, I don't mind removing it because that way the 99 other types don't retain the bug for another 6 months.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me.
@gathogojr, @habbes what do you think about this change.
@anasik apologies