[16.0][MIG][l10n_br_account_payment_brcobranca] #2967
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… parameter to allow different configurations.
… there is the possibility to file don't create account.move .
…w is a object what allows to search for it.
…th differents lengths.
…standard in inherit module.
…ed to standard in inherit module.
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: l10n-brazil-14.0/l10n-brazil-14.0-l10n_br_account_payment_brcobranca Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/l10n-brazil-14-0/l10n-brazil-14-0-l10n_br_account_payment_brcobranca/
Currently translated at 96.0% (24 of 25 strings) Translation: l10n-brazil-14.0/l10n-brazil-14.0-l10n_br_account_payment_brcobranca Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/l10n-brazil-14-0/l10n-brazil-14-0-l10n_br_account_payment_brcobranca/pt_BR/
…no 'Wallet to print in Boleto' in this case for both 240 and 400 there is a Wallet Code, and also for Bradesco 240, for now there this three cases mapped, by this reason the better form to solve seems to be the creation of a new object Boleto Wallet Code that allow attend this cases and, if exist, others.
…ranca need to send 'Nosso Numero + DV', the solution is a different approuch of what was made in v12 because it's seems specific case, Santander 240 don't need, by this reason the calculation are made only for this case during the creation of File.
…ntion to cnab_company_bank_code and code_convenio_lider to convention_code in order to avoid duplication of Fields because CNAB has no standards for the Name of the Fields, changed the method to generate CNAB file to avoid duplicate methods when the case 240 is similar with 400 and update the module to use the case of Santander 240.
…ander 240 and 400.
…to avoid duplicate code.
ygcarvalh
changed the title
|
/ocabot migration l10n_br_account_payment_brcobranca |
2 tasks
|
superseded by #3226 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Depende do PR #2963
Fiz os testes localmente e eles estão funcionando. Agora volto arrumando os módulos para ficarem certos e jogar eles para dentro da branch da 16.0. Então isso deve acontecer nos próximos dias.