-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Typos fix #2329
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Typos fix #2329
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Romashka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Romashka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Romashka <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution! Everything is good overall, please check a comment regarding changes in CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2329 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.40% 74.37% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 109 109
Lines 11493 11493
==========================================
- Hits 8551 8548 -3
- Misses 2277 2279 +2
- Partials 665 666 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
i check it. do you merge it ? |
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Outdated
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Read carefully our Contributing Guidelines to know how to contribute properly in | |||
project. Members and maintainers must adhere to some rules regarding to pull requests | |||
reviews and creation of issues and pull requests: | |||
|
|||
* During code reviews do not comment on coding standards and styles -focus on algorithmical, | |||
* During code reviews do not comment on coding standards and styles -focus on algorithmically, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think correct version should be:
During code reviews do not comment on coding standards and styles -focus on algorithmic,
structural or naming issues-, help to solve problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think correct version should be:
During code reviews do not comment on coding standards and styles -focus on algorithmic, structural or naming issues-, help to solve problem.
yes, you are correct , but i think you can merge my version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@romashka-btc please update this line with algorithmic
instead of algorithmically
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please check CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
suggestion
@AnkushinDaniil @kirugan what why you do not merge it ? i delete old also. |
Could you please make those changes @kirugan asked you to? Unfortunately we can't merge until you've finished. Thanks so much! |
Signed-off-by: Romashka <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i replace it , check it pls. @AnkushinDaniil
Signed-off-by: Romashka <[email protected]>
if i need do something more, write me. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There seems to be a mistake here, you have removed a whole CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There seems to be a mistake here, you have removed a whole
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
hmmm, and what you reccomend to do now ? @AnkushinDaniil
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit appears to be correct 368fb7c
Try reverting to this commit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit appears to be correct 368fb7c Try reverting to this commit
ok, i will do it in 5-8 hours, pls do not close it, because i need go to work now. @AnkushinDaniil thank you !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit appears to be correct 368fb7c Try reverting to this commit
i can not reverting it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit appears to be correct 368fb7c Try reverting to this commit
maybe you will add only another changes ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm so sorry, but I can't. Why not have a go at finding out how to do that yourself? I'm sure you'd be able to manage it, it's not that difficult.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm so sorry, but I can't. Why not have a go at finding out how to do that yourself? I'm sure you'd be able to manage it, it's not that difficult.
i do not understaand what i need to do. can you help me?
Fix: Corrected typos in documentation and code comments
What was changed
algorithmical
toalgorithmically
inCODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
(line 72).decending
todescending
incore\state.go
(line 399).panicing
topanicking
indb\db.go
(line 111).Why these changes were made
Additional Notes