Skip to content

Conversation

joswig
Copy link
Contributor

@joswig joswig commented Mar 18, 2025

Changes to test data only to comply with assumptions other tools (jpl_sequence and seqgen) are making on load and go structure

@joswig joswig requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2025 18:53
@joswig joswig requested a review from goetzrrGit March 18, 2025 18:53
Copy link

@joswig joswig requested a review from shaheerk94 March 18, 2025 18:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@ewferg ewferg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is test data and not a change to the schema, I have no issues

Copy link
Member

@cartermak cartermak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree both that I'm happy to take this quick change to test files, and that this matches our conventions.

Copy link
Contributor

@shaheerk94 shaheerk94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed with Taifun that the lgo metadata format used in this test matches SEQGEN's expectations. Confirmed as well that jpl_sequence expects "lgo": false instead of "lgo": {"boolean": false}.

@cartermak cartermak merged commit 4c834dd into develop Apr 16, 2025
2 checks passed
@cartermak cartermak deleted the fix/lgo_type branch April 16, 2025 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants