Skip to content

Surrogate Modeling of the Aerodynamic Performance for Transonic Regime

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Mohamedelrefaie/TransonicSurrogate

Repository files navigation

TransonicSurrogate

Surrogate Modeling of the Aerodynamic Performance for Transonic Regime

Our Paper: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2024-2220

Dataset available at: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bBR2myjO1u1LDgk2miiC36WpdbGn4cvU?usp=drive_link

Overview

This repository presents an in-depth exploration of machine learning models for surrogate modeling of airfoil aerodynamics in the transonic regime. Our project focuses on using ensemble learning methods and deep learning techniques to predict aerodynamic coefficients accurately.

Models and Dataset

We utilize various models including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, and Neural Networks. The dataset comprises eight transonic airfoils (RAE2822, RAE5212, NACA0012, NACA2412, NACA4412, NACA23012, NACA24112, and NACA25112), tested under a range of AoA and Mach numbers, resulting in 1,362 high-fidelity CFD simulations. Solver: (rhoCentralFoam) Density-based compressible flow solver based on central-upwind schemes of Kurganov and Tadmor

  • 1,362 High-fidelity CFD simulations​
  • OpenFOAM®, rhoCentralFoam solver​
  • Unsteady compressible Euler equations​
  • 128 CPU cores with 4 Nvidia A100 GPUs​
  • 7 mins/simulation

Results and Analysis

Our findings indicate that these models can predict aerodynamic coefficients with high accuracy, achieving an R2 of 99.6% for unseen conditions. Comparative analysis and performance metrics of each model are provided.

The contours demonstrate the efficient capture of the shockwave over the airfoil in our data generation results.

image

Split the data into training (60%), test (20%), and validation sets (20%).

image

Performance comparison of different models on 𝐶𝑙

image

Performance comparison of different models on 𝐶𝑚

image

Repository Structure

  • Data: Contains the dataset of airfoil characteristics and flow conditions.
  • Models: Python scripts and Jupyter notebooks for each ML model.
  • Results: Performance evaluations, plots, and comparative analyses.
  • Figures: Visual representations including scatter plots of predictions vs. actual values, feature importance graphs, and density estimations.

Usage and Contribution

Instructions on how to use the scripts, train models, and analyze results are included. Contributions to enhance model performance or extend the dataset are welcome.

Collaborators and Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the research team from Texas A&M University for their invaluable input and guidance.

Citation

If you find the approach useful, please cite our paper via:

@inbook{doi:10.2514/6.2024-2220,
  author = {Mohamed Elrefaie and Tarek Ayman and Mayar Elrefaie and Eman Sayed and Mahmoud Ayyad and Mohamed M. AbdelRahman},
  title = {Surrogate Modeling of the Aerodynamic Performance for Airfoils in Transonic Regime},
  booktitle = {AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum},
  chapter = {},
  pages = {},
  doi = {10.2514/6.2024-2220},
  URL = {https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2024-2220},
  eprint = {https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2024-2220}}

About

Surrogate Modeling of the Aerodynamic Performance for Transonic Regime

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •