Research project on the CHSH inequality
Member Names: Seaena Kim, Adam Jurkowski, Mark Agib
After cloning the repo run
pip install requirments.txt
so we can all have the same libraries installed
All of the code has an associated README.md for documentation purposes and code/nisq-entaglment/code.ipynb has some more markdown for explanations of specfic descions.
(Working) Research Question: How can the CHSH parameter be used to measure the quality of entanglement on distant qubits based on noisy simulations of quantum computers?
Some prelim results. Noisy simulation with noise model from ibm_brisbane with diffrent phases for entanglemnt 6 qubits away from each other:

Had to regenerate data becuase I realized that the qubits it automaically chose were not next to each other. Do this by using layout_method="trivial" in the transpiler.
Image of which qubits are being used on the physical device and their layout on ibm_brisbane's heavy hex topology

Some papers denote the CHSH inequality a little diffrently. It is denoted as
(Note: This stems from the fact that the expectation value of a observable is the trace of the density matrix and the obervable.)They describe the CHSH parameter or operator as
where
and so when we substitute in for those terms we get
(pretty long lol). But once we group (try this yourself) we get
which happens to be excatly what the CHSH operator was (check for yourself). That's becuase these are equivalent ways to write the same thing.
And the density matrix
where
Finally in the summation
Sources: arXiv:1306.6504v2 and arXiv:2501.03373
TODO: write about other measures of entanglment (negativity, concurrence, and REE) and each paper.