Skip to content

Conversation

@lVentus
Copy link
Contributor

@lVentus lVentus commented Sep 9, 2025

Description of changes

Please provide a short description of the change or if the change is sufficiently described in the GitHub issue, provide a link to the issue.

How has this been tested?

Please describe the test strategy you followed. If not tested, please explain why.

  • automated unit test
  • automated integration test
  • manual, exploratory test

In case of manual test, please document the test well including a set of user instructions and prerequisites. Each including an action, it's result, and where appropriate a screenshot.

Checklist before requesting a review

  • My code is easy to understand
  • My code follows the coding guidelines of this project
  • My code fulfills all acceptance criteria
  • The test coverage (line and branch) is reasonably high, especially on Service classes and other classes with complex logic
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation or
    the wiki/adr
  • I made no breaking changes in the database schema or if so, I will perform a database migration

Checklist for reviewer

  • The code is easy to understand
  • The code follows
    the coding guidelines of
    this project
  • The code is tested or if not, the reason is documented or discussed
  • The added and existing tests reasonably cover the code change
  • The code has no breaking changes in the database schema or if so, the assignee is aware of it and
    will perform a database migration

@JonathanWolp
Copy link
Contributor

Accepted, no blocker. just a hint:
Logging is prepared, but not actively used in the code. A log entry in case of errors would make sense.

@JonathanWolp JonathanWolp merged commit 3630574 into main Oct 1, 2025
3 checks passed
@JonathanWolp JonathanWolp deleted the SettingServiceClient branch October 1, 2025 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants