Notebook typo (#197)

* typos in 4th tutorial
LSSTDESC · Jul 1, 2024 · 1c27387 · 1c27387
1 parent 1e3a1fb
commit 1c27387
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
diff --git a/doc/4Catalogs.html b/doc/4Catalogs.html
@@ -7780,7 +7780,7 @@ <h2 id="4.1-Catalog-based-fields-">4.1 Catalog-based fields <a class="anchor" id
 </div>
 <div class="jp-InputArea jp-Cell-inputArea"><div class="jp-InputPrompt jp-InputArea-prompt">
 </div><div class="jp-RenderedHTMLCommon jp-RenderedMarkdown jp-MarkdownOutput" data-mime-type="text/markdown">
-<p>One of the neat things about the catalog-based pseudo-$C_\ell$ method implemented in NaMaster is that, as described in W24, the estimator is immune to any form of correlated noise between sources. We can show this explicitly here by adding some amount of noise to each source and recomputing the power spectrum.</p>
+<p>One of the neat things about the catalog-based pseudo-$C_\ell$ method implemented in NaMaster is that, as described in W24, the estimator is immune to any form of uncorrelated noise between sources. We can show this explicitly here by adding some amount of noise to each source and recomputing the power spectrum.</p>
 </div>
 </div>
 </div>
@@ -7837,7 +7837,7 @@ <h2 id="4.1-Catalog-based-fields-">4.1 Catalog-based fields <a class="anchor" id
 </div>
 <div class="jp-InputArea jp-Cell-inputArea"><div class="jp-InputPrompt jp-InputArea-prompt">
 </div><div class="jp-RenderedHTMLCommon jp-RenderedMarkdown jp-MarkdownOutput" data-mime-type="text/markdown">
-<h2 id="4.2-Unbiased-estimator-">4.2 Unbiased estimator <a class="anchor" id="Ss4.2"></a><a class="anchor-link" href="#4.2-Unbiased-estimator-">¶</a></h2><p>OK, with this at hand, let's now show that the catalog method is unbiased. We'll do it first for spin-0 fields as simulated above, and then for spin-2 fields (more akin to what a cosmic shear analysis).</p>
+<h2 id="4.2-Unbiased-estimator-">4.2 Unbiased estimator <a class="anchor" id="Ss4.2"></a><a class="anchor-link" href="#4.2-Unbiased-estimator-">¶</a></h2><p>OK, with this at hand, let's now show that the catalog method is unbiased. We'll do it first for spin-0 fields as simulated above, and then for spin-2 fields (more akin to what a cosmic shear analysis would be like).</p>
 </div>
 </div>
 </div>

diff --git a/doc/4Catalogs.ipynb b/doc/4Catalogs.ipynb
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
    "id": "344959c3-d482-40d6-be4c-f7dfe1925360",
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
-    "One of the neat things about the catalog-based pseudo-$C_\\ell$ method implemented in NaMaster is that, as described in W24, the estimator is immune to any form of correlated noise between sources. We can show this explicitly here by adding some amount of noise to each source and recomputing the power spectrum."
+    "One of the neat things about the catalog-based pseudo-$C_\\ell$ method implemented in NaMaster is that, as described in W24, the estimator is immune to any form of uncorrelated noise between sources. We can show this explicitly here by adding some amount of noise to each source and recomputing the power spectrum."
    ]
   },
   {
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## 4.2 Unbiased estimator <a class=\"anchor\" id=\"Ss4.2\"></a>\n",
-    "OK, with this at hand, let's now show that the catalog method is unbiased. We'll do it first for spin-0 fields as simulated above, and then for spin-2 fields (more akin to what a cosmic shear analysis)."
+    "OK, with this at hand, let's now show that the catalog method is unbiased. We'll do it first for spin-0 fields as simulated above, and then for spin-2 fields (more akin to what a cosmic shear analysis would be like)."
    ]
   },
   {