Implement is_articulation
to check if vertex is articulation point
#387
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This factors out the DFS step from
articulation
into a separate functionarticulation_dfs!
and then uses this new function to implementis_articulation(g, v)
which checks whetherv
is an articulation point ofg
without necessarily computing all the articulation points.The branching on
isnothing(is_articulation_pts)
inarticulation_dfs!
is a bit inelegant - as is the fact thatarticulation_dfs!
doesn't mutate ifis_articulation_pts === nothing
, but it seemed the simplest way to avoid code duplication.Aside from these additions, I revised the doc string of
articulation(g)
a bit (e.g., it 1. previously misleadingly stated thatg
had to be connected; it does not; and 2. it changed nomenclature from "articulation point" to "cut vertex" mid-sentence).