Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Short expansion of conditional mutual information #387

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

kahaaga
Copy link
Member

@kahaaga kahaaga commented Aug 4, 2024

No need for review here yet. I still have some polishing to do.

Implements #309

What is in this PR?

  • New conditional association measure ShortExpansionConditionalMutualInformation (SECMI for short).
  • New independence test SECMITest based on this measure.
  • Examples.
  • Tests.

@kahaaga kahaaga added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 4, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.91%. Comparing base (27a2bb8) to head (6ad1ed5).

Files Patch % Lines
.../short_expansion_conditional_mutual_information.jl 88.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/independence_tests/secmi/secmi_test.jl 96.87% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #387      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.94%   94.91%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         111      113       +2     
  Lines        3205     3265      +60     
==========================================
+ Hits         3043     3099      +56     
- Misses        162      166       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants