Conversation
![semgrep-juliahub-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/966331?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| print(io, '\n', " - ", file.filename, " (", file.type, "; ", file.size, " bytes)") | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
| if job.env == nothing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Semgrep identified an issue in your code:
comparisons of nothing should be made with === or !=== or with isnothing()
To resolve this comment:
✨ Commit Assistant fix suggestion
| if job.env == nothing | |
| if isnothing(job.env) |
View step-by-step instructions
- Replace
job.env == nothingwithisnothing(job.env)to properly check ifjob.envisnothing. - Alternatively, if you want to check for non-
nothingvalues, use!isnothing(job.env).
In Julia, isnothing() is the recommended approach for testing if a variable is nothing, to avoid unexpected results with type checks.
💬 Ignore this finding
Reply with Semgrep commands to ignore this finding.
/fp <comment>for false positive/ar <comment>for acceptable risk/other <comment>for all other reasons
Alternatively, triage in Semgrep AppSec Platform to ignore the finding created by compare-nothing.
You can view more details about this finding in the Semgrep AppSec Platform.
| if job.env == nothing | ||
| print(io, "...") | ||
| end | ||
| break |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Semgrep identified an issue in your code:
The break and continue keywords should only be used inside a loop. Using them outside a loop scope results in a runtime error.
To resolve this comment:
✨ Commit Assistant fix suggestion
| break | |
| # break statement removed - it is invalid outside of a loop |
View step-by-step instructions
- Remove the
breakstatement from the code, since it is not inside any loop and will cause a runtime error.
Alternatively, if you intended to exit from a loop, make sure the break statement is placed inside a for or while loop. For example:
for x in xs ... if condition break end end
A break statement outside a loop is a syntax or runtime error in Julia and should be avoided.
💬 Ignore this finding
Reply with Semgrep commands to ignore this finding.
/fp <comment>for false positive/ar <comment>for acceptable risk/other <comment>for all other reasons
Alternatively, triage in Semgrep AppSec Platform to ignore the finding created by break-or-continue-outside-loop.
You can view more details about this finding in the Semgrep AppSec Platform.
|
Semgrep found 1 Block-form functions should explicity return a value. If no meaningful |
1 participant
No description provided.