feat: DIA-1748: 'Generate labels with AI' button in Project, in SC

[niklub]

PR fulfills these requirements

• Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format [fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made ex. fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
• Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
• Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
• Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
• Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)

Change has impacts in these area(s)

(check all that apply)

• Product design
• Backend (Database)
• Backend (API)
• Frontend

Describe the reason for change

(link to issue, supportive screenshots etc.)

What does this fix?

(if this is a bug fix)

What is the new behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What is the current behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What libraries were added/updated?

(list all with version changes)

Does this change affect performance?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

Does this change affect security?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

What alternative approaches were there?

(briefly list any if applicable)

What feature flags were used to cover this change?

(briefly list any if applicable)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

(check only one)

• Yes, and covered entirely by feature flag(s)
• Yes, and covered partially by feature flag(s)
• No
• Not sure (briefly explain the situation below)

What level of testing was included in the change?

(check all that apply)

• e2e
• integration
• unit

Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?

(for bug fixes/features, be as precise as possible. ex. Authentication, Annotation History, Review Stream etc.)

• feat: DIA-1748: 'Generate labels with AI' button in Project, in SC label-studio-sdk#372 linked by Workflow Run

[sentry-io]

🔍 Existing Issues For Review

Your pull request is modifying functions with the following pre-existing issues:

📄 File: label_studio/data_import/functions.py

Function	Unhandled Issue
async_import_background	ValidationError: ["Failed to parse input file upload/118444/0e166bee-inplace.json: 'int' object is not iterable"] ... Event Count: 1

---

_{Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎}

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	3697f03
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/676d372ca99cce00089710f9

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	3697f03
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/676d372c1dda7b0008521f1a

[robot-ci-heartex]

Follow Merge downstream workflow has been failed.

Workflow run

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.22835% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.89%. Comparing base (2e360bc) to head (fc3eab3).
Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
label_studio/users/product_tours/serializers.py	54.83%	14 Missing ⚠️
label_studio/users/product_tours/api.py	60.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
label_studio/ml_models/models.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
label_studio/projects/api.py	83.33%	3 Missing ⚠️
label_studio/projects/models.py	90.90%	1 Missing ⚠️
label_studio/users/product_tours/models.py	95.65%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6789      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.77%   76.89%   +0.12%     
===========================================
  Files          171      175       +4     
  Lines        14021    14129     +108     
===========================================
+ Hits         10765    10865     +100     
- Misses        3256     3264       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytests	76.89% <73.22%> (+0.12%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.