sile: switch to [email protected]

[alerque]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

---

Attempted follow up to #65993 (also see backstory comments in #65976, #57133, and upstream issue №1115). SILE is fully compatible with Lua 5.4 so there shouldn't be any need to hold it back on 5.3 except the hassle of figuring out dependencies. This is my (blind) stab at that.

[carlocab]

Oh, huh. If I had known it was that simple, I'd have done it already. 😄

I left it on 5.3 because I wanted to read the bit32 docs (at least, the installation part of it) before trying, to make sure I'd install it properly.

Turns out that was unnecessary!

[SMillerDev]

Thanks @alerque ! Without contributions like yours it'd be impossible to keep homebrew going with the high standards that users have come to expect from the project. You can feel good knowing that you've made the world a tiny bit better for homebrew users around the world! 👍 🎉

[alerque]

@carlocab It's not too complicated because like almost every other resource there this just leaves luarocks in charge of figuring out how to install it—i.e. upstream is responsible for setting up the build and install properly. The only exception ones are ones that need special values passed in at build time to interface with system libraries, which bit32 doesn't need.

[carlocab]

Thanks for saving me the trouble of having to go back for this!

[BrewTestBot]

🤖 A scheduled task has triggered a merge.