Skip to content

Conversation

@abhijeetkjha-google
Copy link
Contributor

compute: added `interconnects` field to `google_compute_interconnect_attachment_group. logicalStructure.regions.metros.facilities.zones` and deprecated `interconnect` field

there was a typo in the initial implementation; the field was called attachment instead of attachments in the MMv1 yaml. There are two parts to this work:

Add the new field & deprecate the old field
Remove the old field in a major release
Docs: https://googlecloudplatform.github.io/magic-modules/breaking-changes/make-a-breaking-change/

….regions.metros.facilities.zones.attachment to .attachments
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 1325
Passed tests: 1239
Skipped tests: 86
Affected tests: 0

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • compute

🟢 All tests passed!

View the build log

@abhijeetkjha-google abhijeetkjha-google marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 11:53
@github-actions
Copy link

Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run.

Googlers: For automatic test runs see go/terraform-auto-test-runs.

@malhotrasagar2212, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look.

You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally.

Copy link
Collaborator

@malhotrasagar2212 malhotrasagar2212 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @abhijeetkjha-google , this looks good to me. Just a suggestion, the PR description is clear on attachment-> attachments. But the PR title and release note mentions interconnect, which is a bit misleading- would you mind tweaking it to reference the attachments for easier history scanning? Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants