Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework synchronized block from BeanDeserializerBase #4458

Merged

Conversation

pjfanning
Copy link
Member

@pjfanning pjfanning commented Mar 28, 2024

Changed to use a ConcurrentHashMap internally so we don't have to lock at all - with one remaining exception.

The map is transient so we need to ensure that when we create it - that only one thread can do this. We have retained the synchronized block just for this part.

@pjfanning
Copy link
Member Author

@cowtowncoder does this change look ok? ConcurrentHashMap better hanndled concurrent calls and the lock is only used to ensure that the map is lazily created once and once only.

/**
* Lock used to prevent multiple creation of _subDeserializers map
*/
private final ReentrantLock _subDeserializersLock = new ReentrantLock();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This now adds ReentrantLock for every BeanDeserializer instance, regardless of whether polymorphic handling is enabled. PM handling likely being a small minority of all usage.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Not sure; fundamentally this adds a lock for vast majority of deserializers that are for non-polymorphic handling.

This seems like a case where it'd be good to figure it out if there is an actual performance problem to solve, instead of proactively making changes.

@pjfanning pjfanning changed the title remove synchronized block from BeanDeserializerBase rework synchronized block from BeanDeserializerBase Apr 7, 2024
@pjfanning
Copy link
Member Author

@cowtowncoder I have taken out the ReentrantLock and use a synchronized block again - but the refactor in this PR means it won't be hit as often. Could you consider the refactored PR?

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder changed the title rework synchronized block from BeanDeserializerBase Rework synchronized block from BeanDeserializerBase Apr 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think this makes sense.

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder merged commit 5a59cef into FasterXML:2.18 Apr 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

@cowtowncoder I have taken out the ReentrantLock and use a synchronized block again - but the refactor in this PR means it won't be hit as often. Could you consider the refactored PR?

Yes, approved, will merge.

cowtowncoder added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants