-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Forward Validator Balances #25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
thogard785
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
forward-balances
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1a33d6d
added a payValidator method so that a validator can transfer their ba…
thogard785 77a3293
forge fmt
thogard785 74c86b2
added a generic function to pay a fee to a specific validator
thogard785 f27387d
Merge branch 'main' into forward-balances
jj1980a 37da8f2
fix tests to accomodate new getValidatorIfNotCurrent function
jj1980a d81588d
forward balance between PFL contracts test
jj1980a File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to block
_validatorbeingblock.coinbase(we don't block it inpayValidatorFee).To stay consistent with the
payValidatorFeefunction, I suggest adding a_payorparam, and corrected values emitted byRelayFeeCollected.Another suggestion would be dropping the
_payorparam for bothpayValidatorFeeandpaySpecificValidatorFeefunctions, and set thepayorparam of theRelayFeeCollectedevent tomsg.sender.