Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: Use GitHub Actions to run tests #14

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

Johni0702
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results

95 tests   95 ✔️  15m 7s ⏱️
15 suites    0 💤
15 files      0

Results for commit 9eecce4.

Copy link
Member

@DJtheRedstoner DJtheRedstoner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a specific advantage to splitting up each test class as a separate job?

@Johni0702
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there a specific advantage to splitting up each test class as a separate job?

Parallelism. This way all the tests can run in less than three minutes, compared to 15 if ran in sequence (or probably around 9 with the two cores the standard github runner has).
Would of course be less of a resource waste if they just allowed you to provision more cpu cores for certain steps, but they don't (without paying for a larger runner, and why would you when you can just provision many small ones).

@Johni0702 Johni0702 merged commit 7644f6e into master Oct 2, 2023
35 checks passed
@Johni0702 Johni0702 deleted the feature/github-actions-tests branch October 2, 2023 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants