[ABLD-351] Remove the //compliance:licenses target and move its remnants to //packages/install_dir

[aiuto]

Remove the //compliance:licenses target and move its remnants to //packages/install_dir

Last month we added a macro to replace the complex chain of targets need to run the license gather aspect to build the set of license files. It is used in //packages/agent/linux and //packages/agent/heroku. This change applies the same macro to //packages/install_dir.

This is only an interim cleanup. As we create the top level targets for each package, we'll apply the same pattern at those target points and stop gathering licenses in //packages/install_dir. The cleanup now will make future changes easier to reason about.

Related change: Fix //deps:all_deps to reflect the difference between plain and heroku versions. We were including too much in all_deps, resulting in false license declarations in the heroku build. This is also only an interim cleanup. We will eventually move the deps into the openscap build file and not need them in all_deps.

test plan

On main:
$ bazelisk run --//:install_dir=/tmp/l.1 -- //packages/install_dir:install

On PR
$ bazelisk run --//:install_dir=/tmp/l.2 -- //packages/install_dir:install
$ diff -r /tmp/l.1 /tmp/l.2
Only in /tmp/l.2/LICENSES: acl-COPYING.LGPL
Only in /tmp/l.2/LICENSES: attr-COPYING.LGPL
Only in /tmp/l.2/LICENSES: gcrypt-COPYING.LIB
Only in /tmp/l.2/LICENSES: libpcap-LICENSE
Only in /tmp/l.2/LICENSES: libsepol-LICENSE
Only in /tmp/l.2/LICENSES: openscap-COPYING
Only in /tmp/l.2/sources: acl
Only in /tmp/l.2/sources: attr
Only in /tmp/l.2/sources: libsepol

This shows that we retained all the old licenses from before this PR, and have correctly included the ones we use for openscap on this linux test. On macos, we do not see the openscap additions.

[agent-platform-auto-pr]

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 8766844
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard

31 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)

	Quality gate	Current Size
✅	agent_deb_amd64	752.511 MiB
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	701.180 MiB
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	326.974 MiB
✅	agent_msi	663.054 MiB
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	752.495 MiB
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	701.164 MiB
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	731.268 MiB
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	683.256 MiB
✅	agent_suse_amd64	752.495 MiB
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	701.164 MiB
✅	agent_suse_arm64	731.268 MiB
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	683.256 MiB
✅	docker_agent_amd64	814.612 MiB
✅	docker_agent_arm64	817.976 MiB
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	1005.491 MiB
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	997.574 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	181.112 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	196.918 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	7.135 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	6.689 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	38.840 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	37.128 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	30.059 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	28.204 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	30.059 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	30.059 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	43.037 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	40.135 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	40.705 MiB
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	43.038 MiB
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	43.038 MiB

On-wire sizes (compressed)

	Quality gate	Change	Size (prev → curr → max)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	-58.34 KiB (0.03% reduction)	183.949 → 183.892 → 184.810
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	+63.95 KiB (0.04% increase)	172.616 → 172.678 → 173.790
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	neutral	87.158 MiB → 88.450
✅	agent_msi	+8.0 KiB (0.01% increase)	143.152 → 143.160 → 143.300
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	+50.67 KiB (0.03% increase)	186.830 → 186.879 → 188.160
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	-4.97 KiB (0.00% reduction)	175.731 → 175.726 → 176.600
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	-10.47 KiB (0.01% reduction)	168.625 → 168.615 → 169.930
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	-4.73 KiB (0.00% reduction)	159.172 → 159.168 → 160.550
✅	agent_suse_amd64	+50.67 KiB (0.03% increase)	186.830 → 186.879 → 188.160
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	-4.97 KiB (0.00% reduction)	175.731 → 175.726 → 176.600
✅	agent_suse_arm64	-10.47 KiB (0.01% reduction)	168.625 → 168.615 → 169.930
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	-4.73 KiB (0.00% reduction)	159.172 → 159.168 → 160.550
✅	docker_agent_amd64	+3.85 KiB (0.00% increase)	276.622 → 276.626 → 277.400
✅	docker_agent_arm64	+14.58 KiB (0.01% increase)	264.050 → 264.065 → 266.040
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	+9.63 KiB (0.00% increase)	345.262 → 345.271 → 346.020
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	+15.64 KiB (0.00% increase)	328.668 → 328.683 → 330.660
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	neutral	63.994 MiB → 64.490
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	neutral	60.256 MiB → 61.170
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	neutral	2.994 MiB → 3.330
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	neutral	2.726 MiB → 3.090
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	neutral	15.031 MiB → 15.820
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	neutral	14.356 MiB → 14.830
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	neutral	7.946 MiB → 8.790
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	neutral	6.826 MiB → 7.710
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	neutral	7.957 MiB → 8.800
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	neutral	7.957 MiB → 8.800
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	+2.07 KiB (0.02% increase)	11.290 → 11.292 → 12.040
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	neutral	9.653 MiB → 10.450
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	neutral	9.844 MiB → 10.620
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	neutral	11.308 MiB → 12.060
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	neutral	11.308 MiB → 12.060

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: d7464398-5d33-44d2-b23a-aab390b3ad26

Baseline: 8766844
Comparison: abf15fb
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+4.05	[+0.87, +7.23]	1	Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+4.05	[+0.87, +7.23]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_logs	memory utilization	+1.72	[+1.62, +1.83]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+1.50	[+1.43, +1.57]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter	memory utilization	+0.27	[+0.04, +0.50]	1	Logs
➖	docker_containers_memory	memory utilization	+0.09	[+0.02, +0.17]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.02	[-0.37, +0.40]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	+0.01	[-0.08, +0.09]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.13, +0.12]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.13, +0.11]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.02	[-0.46, +0.42]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.05	[-0.10, -0.00]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.05	[-0.57, +0.46]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	-0.05	[-0.11, +0.00]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	-0.08	[-0.12, -0.04]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_logs	memory utilization	-0.24	[-0.30, -0.19]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_metrics	memory utilization	-0.30	[-0.45, -0.14]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-0.36	[-0.41, -0.32]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	-0.37	[-0.59, -0.15]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_delta	memory utilization	-0.42	[-0.61, -0.22]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders	memory utilization	-0.49	[-0.54, -0.43]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative	memory utilization	-0.60	[-0.75, -0.44]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics	memory utilization	-0.62	[-0.86, -0.39]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-1.19	[-2.66, +0.29]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	memory_usage	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

• quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.