-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pretest dependencies #1075
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Pretest dependencies #1075
Conversation
We'll need an accompanying site-side PR to not crash the bridge when we send it |
8da87e8
to
c91c9d8
Compare
c91c9d8
to
2a9d3e7
Compare
Also have |
2a9d3e7
to
0e49c23
Compare
0e49c23
to
d68e6b2
Compare
d68e6b2
to
4e31149
Compare
4e31149
to
e3b2ea6
Compare
e3b2ea6
to
db2071c
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 80.75% // Head: 53.87% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1075 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 80.75% 53.87% -26.88%
===========================================
Files 134 134
Lines 4770 4850 +80
===========================================
- Hits 3852 2613 -1239
- Misses 918 2237 +1319
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
fe77c24
to
1fe64ba
Compare
1fe64ba
to
621ce44
Compare
This commit changes the previous "batch dependencies" in a few ways: 1. Dependencies can now be specified on any top-level unit, case or batch. 2. Dependencies are specified with YAML alias notation, not numbers. It also implements pretests, including a `PRETEST-END` IPC packet.
621ce44
to
5001269
Compare
) | ||
else: | ||
self.main_case += 1 | ||
report(ansi_style('%sTest case %2d %-3s %s' % (case_padding, self.main_case, colored_codes[0], case_info))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This string is almost identical to the one used for pretests. Can we make "Test case"
and "Pretest case"
substituted in with another %s
?
Same comment below for batches.
@@ -194,11 +196,25 @@ def _ipc_compile_message(self, _report, compile_message: str) -> None: | |||
self.packet_manager.compile_message_packet(compile_message) | |||
|
|||
def _ipc_grading_begin(self, _report, is_pretested: bool) -> None: | |||
self.in_pretests = False | |||
self.pretest_batch = 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use a single set of batch/case variables, and reset them when we end pretests? That way we don't have dangling state after pretests finish.
class GradingAbort(Exception): | ||
pass | ||
|
||
def grade(case: AbstractTestCase) -> Result: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
def grade(case: AbstractTestCase) -> Result: | |
def grade_single(case: AbstractTestCase) -> Result: |
To match the naming of the rest of the functions.
# output. So, we trim it here so we don't run out of memory in the controller. | ||
result.proc_output = result.output | ||
yield IPC.RESULT, (batch_number, case_number, result) | ||
failed_pretests: Set[int] = set() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than have this state here captured by the closure in should_run_main_test
, what if we took it as the first parameter to should_run_main_test
, and then applied it with partial(...
?
failed_pretests, pretest_result = yield from grade_many(pretests, should_run_pretest) | ||
yield IPC.PRETEST_END, () | ||
if not self.grader.run_pretests_only: | ||
if pretest_result == GradeManyResult.SKIP_ALL: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this ever happen without len(failed_pretests) != 0
? Do we need this extra enum, or does nonzero failed_pretests
already imply SKIP_ALL
here?
failed = True | ||
yield from skip_toplevel(test) | ||
elif isinstance(test, Batch): | ||
yield IPC.BATCH_BEGIN, (test.batch,) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we move these yields into grade_batched_cases
? It's a little weird that the case results come from within it, but the batch begin/end markers don't.
result = self.grader.grade(case) | ||
result = grade(test) | ||
failed = result.result_flag & Result.WA | ||
yield IPC.RESULT, (None, test.position, result) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we move this yield into grade
?
This PR changes the previous "batch dependencies" in a few ways:
It also implements pretests, including a
PRETEST-END
IPC packet.