Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

20240226 release notes #4133

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

20240226 release notes #4133

merged 10 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

shashankbarsin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated

* Preview features
* Istio revision asm-1-20 is now available with Istio-based service mesh add-on. More information on performing canary upgrade for the new minor revision of Istio can be found [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/istio-upgrade). Istio revision asm-1-18 is no longer supported.
* PodIPAllocationMode property introduced on node pools for static block allocation in the case of Azure CNI.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Docs? and is this a preview feature?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes under preview. waiting for docs link from Chase

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
* PodIPAllocationMode property introduced on node pools for static block allocation in the case of Azure CNI.

* Behavioral change
* `ignoreUnfixed` is not set to `false` in [scanner options](https://eraser-dev.github.io/eraser/docs/customization#scanner-options) for [Image Cleaner](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/image-cleaner) so that images with vulnerabilities are deleted even if there is no fix/patch available for it yet.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a bug fix?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not or now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch. now :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wangyira - not a bug IMO, just changing default towards best practices IMO

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
### Announcements
* Starting in March, due to Gatekeeper Upstream removing validation for constraint template contents at create/update time, [the Azure Policy addon](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/concepts/policy-for-kubernetes#install-azure-policy-add-on-for-aks) will now no longer support the validation for constraint template. The Azure Policy Add-On will report [‘InvalidConstraint/Template’ compliance reason code](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/how-to/determine-non-compliance#aks-resource-provider-mode-compliance-reasons) for detected errors after constraint template admission. This change does not impact [other compliance reason codes](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/how-to/determine-non-compliance#aks-resource-provider-mode-compliance-reasons). Customers are encouraged to continue to follow best practices when updating Azure Policy for Kubernetes definitions (i.e. [Gator CLI](https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/website/docs/gator/)).
* Starting with Kubernetes 1.29, the default cgroups implementation on Azure Linux AKS nodes will be cgroupsv2. Older versions of Java, .NET and NodeJS do not support memory querying v2 memory constraints and this will lead to out of memory (OOM) issues for workloads. Please test your applications for cgroupsv2 compliance, and read the [FAQ](https://learn.microsoft.com/troubleshoot/azure/azure-kubernetes/aks-increased-memory-usage-cgroup-v2) for cgroupsv2.
* Beginning with AKS support of Kubernetes 1.29 in preview, optimized reservation logic reduces Kube-reserved memory by up to 20% depending on the node configuration and will apply to all clusters. More information can be found [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/concepts-clusters-workloads#memory)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.29 is out, ensure these are in the version changes table in the docs and can remove

@kaarthis cc

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
### Release notes

* Preview features
* Istio revision asm-1-20 is now available with Istio-based service mesh add-on. More information on performing canary upgrade for the new minor revision of Istio can be found [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/istio-upgrade). Istio revision asm-1-18 is no longer supported.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Component update?

CHANGELOG.md Outdated

* Behavioral change
* `ignoreUnfixed` is not set to `false` in [scanner options](https://eraser-dev.github.io/eraser/docs/customization#scanner-options) for [Image Cleaner](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/image-cleaner) so that images with vulnerabilities are deleted even if there is no fix/patch available for it yet.
* Label `kubernetes.azure.com/managedby: aks` has been introduced to all managed addon components on cluster.
Copy link
Member

@palma21 palma21 Feb 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Link and close respective issue in the roadmap

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@palma21 palma21 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please confirm pod up allocation lrb

Copy link
Contributor

@kaarthis kaarthis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we pls add the patches.

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@shashankbarsin shashankbarsin requested a review from kaarthis March 1, 2024 16:51
@shashankbarsin shashankbarsin merged commit 0e3411c into master Mar 1, 2024
3 checks passed
Copy link

@KidiIT KidiIT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reviewed and approved🫶❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants