-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
20240226 release notes #4133
20240226 release notes #4133
Conversation
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
||
* Preview features | ||
* Istio revision asm-1-20 is now available with Istio-based service mesh add-on. More information on performing canary upgrade for the new minor revision of Istio can be found [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/istio-upgrade). Istio revision asm-1-18 is no longer supported. | ||
* PodIPAllocationMode property introduced on node pools for static block allocation in the case of Azure CNI. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Docs? and is this a preview feature?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes under preview. waiting for docs link from Chase
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
* PodIPAllocationMode property introduced on node pools for static block allocation in the case of Azure CNI. | ||
|
||
* Behavioral change | ||
* `ignoreUnfixed` is not set to `false` in [scanner options](https://eraser-dev.github.io/eraser/docs/customization#scanner-options) for [Image Cleaner](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/image-cleaner) so that images with vulnerabilities are deleted even if there is no fix/patch available for it yet. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a bug fix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not or now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch. now :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wangyira - not a bug IMO, just changing default towards best practices IMO
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
### Announcements | ||
* Starting in March, due to Gatekeeper Upstream removing validation for constraint template contents at create/update time, [the Azure Policy addon](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/concepts/policy-for-kubernetes#install-azure-policy-add-on-for-aks) will now no longer support the validation for constraint template. The Azure Policy Add-On will report [‘InvalidConstraint/Template’ compliance reason code](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/how-to/determine-non-compliance#aks-resource-provider-mode-compliance-reasons) for detected errors after constraint template admission. This change does not impact [other compliance reason codes](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/how-to/determine-non-compliance#aks-resource-provider-mode-compliance-reasons). Customers are encouraged to continue to follow best practices when updating Azure Policy for Kubernetes definitions (i.e. [Gator CLI](https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/website/docs/gator/)). | ||
* Starting with Kubernetes 1.29, the default cgroups implementation on Azure Linux AKS nodes will be cgroupsv2. Older versions of Java, .NET and NodeJS do not support memory querying v2 memory constraints and this will lead to out of memory (OOM) issues for workloads. Please test your applications for cgroupsv2 compliance, and read the [FAQ](https://learn.microsoft.com/troubleshoot/azure/azure-kubernetes/aks-increased-memory-usage-cgroup-v2) for cgroupsv2. | ||
* Beginning with AKS support of Kubernetes 1.29 in preview, optimized reservation logic reduces Kube-reserved memory by up to 20% depending on the node configuration and will apply to all clusters. More information can be found [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/concepts-clusters-workloads#memory) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1.29 is out, ensure these are in the version changes table in the docs and can remove
@kaarthis cc
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
### Release notes | ||
|
||
* Preview features | ||
* Istio revision asm-1-20 is now available with Istio-based service mesh add-on. More information on performing canary upgrade for the new minor revision of Istio can be found [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/istio-upgrade). Istio revision asm-1-18 is no longer supported. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Component update?
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
||
* Behavioral change | ||
* `ignoreUnfixed` is not set to `false` in [scanner options](https://eraser-dev.github.io/eraser/docs/customization#scanner-options) for [Image Cleaner](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/aks/image-cleaner) so that images with vulnerabilities are deleted even if there is no fix/patch available for it yet. | ||
* Label `kubernetes.azure.com/managedby: aks` has been introduced to all managed addon components on cluster. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Link and close respective issue in the roadmap
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please confirm pod up allocation lrb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we pls add the patches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All reviewed and approved🫶❤️
No description provided.