You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An example inference, from discussion with Barry, explaining need for history-segment-of to be functional.
We want:
part-of-during o is-history-of < part-of-at-some-time.
in other words, if a part-of-during b and b is-history-of c then a part-of-at-some-time b
or
s1 segment of history of a and
s2 segment of history of b
and s1 part of s2
=>
a part-of-at-some-time b
a part-of-during some (history-segment-of b that has-temporal-projection ( is-temporal-projection of s1))
in other words:
s1 segment of history of a and
s2 segment of history of b
and s1 part of s2
then
exists(h,t)
a part-of-during h and
h history-segment-of b and
h has-temporal-projection t and
t is-temporal-projection of s1
--
(I think this can be made into a property chain, so we get (effectively) transitive part during some process)
From [email protected] on May 15, 2013 06:43:48
to allow for complete use of histories for certain kinds of temporal statements.
rel-during
domain continuant
range history-segment
inverse (invent name)
a rel-during b =
forall t, t part-of temporal-projection-of b
a rel (history-of b)
history-segment =
temporal-part-of some history
subclass of history
history-segment-of
domain history-segment
range continuant
functional
inverse has-history-segment
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=176
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: