Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add relation rel-during and class history-segment #175

Open
zhengj2007 opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Add relation rel-during and class history-segment #175

zhengj2007 opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Owner

From [email protected] on May 15, 2013 06:43:48

to allow for complete use of histories for certain kinds of temporal statements.

rel-during
domain continuant
range history-segment
inverse (invent name)

a rel-during b =
forall t, t part-of temporal-projection-of b
a rel (history-of b)

history-segment =
temporal-part-of some history
subclass of history

history-segment-of
domain history-segment
range continuant
functional
inverse has-history-segment

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=176

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Owner Author

From [email protected] on May 27, 2013 14:30:21

An example inference, from discussion with Barry, explaining need for history-segment-of to be functional.

We want:

part-of-during o is-history-of < part-of-at-some-time.

in other words, if a part-of-during b and b is-history-of c then a part-of-at-some-time b

or

s1 segment of history of a and
s2 segment of history of b
and s1 part of s2
=>
a part-of-at-some-time b

a part-of-during some (history-segment-of b that has-temporal-projection ( is-temporal-projection of s1))

in other words:
s1 segment of history of a and
s2 segment of history of b
and s1 part of s2
then
exists(h,t)
a part-of-during h and
h history-segment-of b and
h has-temporal-projection t and
t is-temporal-projection of s1

--

(I think this can be made into a property chain, so we get (effectively) transitive part during some process)

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Owner Author

From [email protected] on June 05, 2013 11:20:35

Discussed on call. Go with it for now, as long as it doesn't slow release and subject to review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant