Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible need for never-rel temporal relation #174

Open
zhengj2007 opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Possible need for never-rel temporal relation #174

zhengj2007 opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Owner

From [email protected] on May 15, 2013 06:38:08

Prove whether or not there is an expression that amounts to an entity not having a part of some type. TR-safe lacks-part. If not add another relation to compensate

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=175

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Owner Author

From [email protected] on June 05, 2013 11:24:22

see if this is achievable with

x lack_part_at_all_times tail

(x and has_part_at_some_time some tail) equivalent nothing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant