Support expect(val).to(be(bool)) syntax

[zhangsu]

Sometimes it's more readable to say

expect(...).to(be(true))
expect(...).to(be(false))

than to say

expect(...).to(be_truthy)
expect(...).to(be_falsey)

When we are sure that the subject must be true (1) or false (0), we should be able to use the be(true) and be(false) syntax to match the exact value, instead of matching non-zero for "truthy" and zero for "falsey". We should be able to do this by overloading the Be#match template method with boolean parameter type.