Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project seeking new maintainers #143

Open
dnrce opened this issue Dec 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Project seeking new maintainers #143

dnrce opened this issue Dec 23, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@dnrce
Copy link
Member

dnrce commented Dec 23, 2021

@jrgifford and I haven't been taking care of YamlDb in a while, so this project is officially seeking a new maintainer or maintainers to steward it into the future.

Do you use YamlDb and have an interest in taking over? Let us know here!

@tovodeverett
Copy link

I'm considering taking over as a maintainer, but I will need access to someone who can serve as a "lifeline". As I mentioned in my post back in June, I have a vague understanding that there is a whole knowledge base required to maintain a gem properly, and I know I don't have it! Is there anyone available who can serve as that mentor?

@starswan
Copy link

I'm interested - I'm using it in several of my personal projects, and although I've never really maintained a gem like this before I have a rough idea of what is required. Maybe @tovodeverett and I could pair up and do it together?

@tovodeverett
Copy link

As you can see by how long it took me to respond to the post from @starswan , I don't have a lot of spare time in my life right now, so I can't really commit to even helping. Also, I'd say I have less than a rough idea of what is required. I do have a number of monkey patches to yaml_db that I'd love to get into it, but for better or worse monkey patching has been the patch of least resistance for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants